CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-01

Gaze-Informed Proactive AI Assistance for Children's Picture Exploration

Zekun Wu, Man Su, Huiyong Li, Tomohiro Nagashima, Anna Maria Feit

Proactive assistance with large language models (LLMs) has received growing attention in the human computer interaction (HCI) community. However, most past work on proactive LLMs' assistance has focused on adult users and task-oriented settings, leaving open how such systems could support children, whose interests and needs are often expressed through gaze and other nonverbal behaviors rather than explicit requests. In this study, we focus on two key challenges of proactive assistance in children's picture exploration: when to provide assistance and what assistance to provide based on children's nonverbal behaviors. To address these challenges, we introduce Ollie, a gaze-informed proactive artificial intelligence (AI) assistant that offers short narrative descriptions based on where a child is looking. Ollie uses children's gaze to estimate their attention, identify their current visual focus, and select a related picture region for the LLM to verbally describe. In a within-subject experiment, we compared gaze-informed assistance with random assistance. Results show that gaze-informed assistance kept children's attention on their current focus for a longer period of time, and guided them more effectively to related picture regions. Children, parents, and a participating kindergarten teacher viewed Ollie positively and consider that it better matched children's interests when compared with the random assistance. This work shows the feasibility of using gaze as an implicit input for proactive AI assistance for children and provides design implications for future child-centered AI systems.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HCcs.CL2026-07-20

It Matters How You Say It: Exploring Rhetorical Patterns for AI-Assisted Information Evaluation

Sadra Sabouri, Zeinabsadat Saghi, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber, Jonathan May, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Souti Chattopadhyay

Prior work on AI-assisted information evaluation has largely focused on what AI systems communicate, comparing explanation types and formats, with responses predominantly cast in directive rhetoric where the system delivers a verdict and the user passively accepts it. While debat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-20

ChatMuse: Supporting In-Person Small-Group Conversation Experience with a Proactive Assistive AI Agent in Mixed Reality

Shaoze Zhou, Joaquin Frangi, Diana Nelly Rivera Rodriguez, Rawan Alghofaili, Janet G. Johnson, Lingyao Li, et al.

In-person small-group conversations occur across nearly every aspect of daily life and play a crucial role in social interaction. However, achieving effective in-person group conversations can be challenging and cognitively demanding. While recent Mixed Reality (MR) headsets show…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.CY2026-07-02

Doom Researching: A Conceptual Framework for Repetitive AI-Assisted Information Seeking, Cognitive Offloading, and the Illusion of Knowing

Santosh Premi Adhikari

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have made information seeking faster, more conversational, and more cognitively comfortable. These affordances can support learning and productivity, but they can also encourage a repetitive pa…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-11

Learning behavior accounts for background-related advantage in AI-assisted education

Jingwei Yi, Yueqi Xie, Jiyan He, Rui Ye, Junming Huang, Bin Zhu, et al.

Generative AI has been found, and will likely be found increasingly, useful in education. However, existing AI-for-education studies provide inconsistent evidence on its average effects. More broadly, research on prior educational technologies shows that average effects often mas…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-06-29

Ethics and Social Responsibility in AI-Assisted Interviewing: An LLM-in-the-Loop Study of AI-Generated Follow-Up Questions

He Zhang, Yueyan Liu, Xin Guan, Jie Cai, John M. Carroll

Semi-structured interviews rely on timely, context-sensitive follow-up questions, yet interviewers' cognitive load and limited domain familiarity can constrain probing depth. We report findings from an LLM-in-the-loop Wizard-of-Oz (WoZ) study that simulates an AI follow-up assist…

View free PDFSource page