CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-29

When transformers learn "impossible" languages, what do they learn?

Ram Janarthan, Coleman Haley, Sharon Goldwater

Recent work suggests that transformer language models show a bias towards human languages over unnatural ("impossible") languages argued to be unacquirable by humans. However, this literature has largely based these claims on differences in sample efficiency and test-set perplexity, rather than on direct evaluations of the linguistic capacities that could plausibly explain non-attestation in human languages. We evaluate two theoretically motivated linking hypotheses: impossibility arising from deficiencies in grammatical sensitivity or generative production. Using GPT-2 style models trained on perturbed "impossible" variants of English, we measure sensitivity to grammaticality using BLiMP minimal pairs, finding that model performance exhibits only gradual degradation, mediated by the language's information locality. In contrast, these models exhibited pronounced failures in generation, producing substantially fewer high-quality sentences at longer lengths. Together, these results suggest generative deficiency and transmission failures as a plausible linking hypothesis between language model behaviour and non-attestation of impossible languages.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-17

Induction in Both Directions: A Mechanistic Analysis of In-Context Learning in Masked Diffusion Language Models

Andy Catruna, Emilian Radoi

While the internal mechanisms of autoregressive (AR) transformers have been studied extensively, much less is known about diffusion language models (DLMs), an emerging alternative that generates text by iterative denoising. In this work, we study how DLMs implement induction, a m…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-22

Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Selective Evidence Adoption from Contaminated Retrieval Results

Yanyu Chen, Yue Li, Yongyi Cui, Dongsheng Shi, Lichang Dai

Retrieval-augmented large language models frequently face contexts that interleave useful evidence with misleading statements or instruction-like content. Blanket refusal discards valid evidence, whereas uncritical adoption yields incorrect or unsafe answers. The ability to selec…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-09

Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Power Transformation and Sign-Preserving Score Aggregation with Adaptive Feature Retention

Ryota Kobayashi, Tsubasa Hirakawa, Takayoshi Yamashita, Hironobu Fujiyoshi, Yasunori Ishii, Tomoyuki Okuno, et al.

This paper proposes an improved structured pruning method for large language models (LLMs) that addresses key challenges in adapting Adaptive Feature Retention (AFR), an unstructured pruning technique, to structured pruning. When applying AFR to structured pruning, three major pr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.DLcs.IR2026-06-29Cited by 5

Exploring Motivations for Algorithm Mention in the Domain of Natural Language Processing: A Deep Learning Approach

Yuzhuo Wang, Yi Xiang, Chengzhi Zhang

With the rise of data-intensive science, algorithms have become central to scientific research. In academic papers, algorithms are mentioned for different purposes, such as describing, using, comparing, or improving methods for specific research tasks. Identifying these purposes…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-05Cited by 5

Failures and Successes to Learn a Core Conceptual Distinction from the Statistics of Language

Zhimin Hu, Jeroen van Paridon, Gary Lupyan

Generic statements like "tigers are striped" and "cars have radios" communicate information that is, in general, true. However, while the first statement is true in principle, the second is true only statistically. People are exquisitely sensitive to this principled-vs-statistica…

View free PDFSource page