CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-06-30

Bridging the Gap Between Latent and Explicit Reasoning with Looped Transformers

Ying Fan, Anej Svete, Kangwook Lee

Language models typically reason via explicit chain-of-thought (CoT), generating intermediate steps token-by-token. Latent CoT offers an alternative: it performs multi-step reasoning in the model's hidden states, replacing decoded tokens with continuous representations for greater efficiency. However, existing latent CoT methods underperform explicit CoT beyond 1B parameters, and the gap widens with scale. Looped, or recurrent-depth, Transformers, which reuse their weights to increase computation depth without adding parameters, are a natural fit for latent reasoning. We therefore ask whether looped Transformers can bridge this gap. We answer affirmatively with a simple recipe: a looped padded Transformer that processes K latent blocks in parallel for R iterations, with a cross-entropy loss on each latent position's gold CoT-step token, similar to explicit CoT supervision. We instantiate it as LOTUS (Looped Transformers with parallel supervision on latents). LOTUS is, to our knowledge, the first latent-CoT method to bridge the gap to explicit CoT at the 3B scale, while cutting thought-phase latency by 2.5x-6.9x from compact math expressions to natural language. Projecting LOTUS's post-loop latents through the base LM head recovers the gold reasoning steps and even surfaces alternative valid intermediate steps, evidence that its latent space is interpretable and CoT-aligned. Ablations confirm that both the looped backbone and the parallel supervision on gold CoT tokens are essential. Code is available at https://github.com/yingfan-bot/lotus.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-21

LatentMT: Machine Translation with Latent Reasoning

Wei-Rui Chen, Samar M. Magdy, Chiyu Zhang, Wenhui Zhu, Zhipeng Wang, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed

Latent-reasoning looped language models (LoopLMs) offer a different scaling path for machine translation (MT): instead of increasing parameter count or emitting explicit chain-of-thought tokens, they spend additional recurrent computation inside hidden states. We introduce Latent…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-07

Final Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Analyzing Latent Reasoning Faithfulness Along Training Trajectories

Hengyu Jin, Shu Yang, Di Wang

Latent reasoning methods perform multi-step inference entirely in the model's continuous hidden states, promising more compact and efficient reasoning. However, these opaque hidden states raise a question of faithfulness: whether these latent reasoning steps causally drive the fi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

DiscoLoop: Looping Discrete Embeddings and Continuous Hidden States for Multi-hop Reasoning

Hengyu Fu, Tianyu Guo, Zixuan Wang, Hanlin Zhu, Jason D. Lee, Jiantao Jiao, et al.

Large language models achieve strong performance on many reasoning tasks when allowed to externalize intermediate steps as Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, many questions require the model to internalize the multi-step reasoning within a single forward pass before generating the…

View free PDFSource page