CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-14

Vertical Standardisation for High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act: A Domain-Specific Framework for Algorithmic Hiring

Anna Gatzioura, Vrettos Moulos, Nina Baranowska

According to the recent European legislation, high-risk AI systems will have to adapt in order to comply with requirements related to specific areas, like risk management, data quality and governance, logging and traceability, technical documentation, transparency, human oversight, and accuracy, as outlined in the European Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. As the standardisation process for AI is expected to remain iterative and, so far, there are no European standards on AI fully covering the challenges of algorithmic hiring, we propose specific standardisation-oriented recommendations related to the relevant AI areas specified by the European Commission. For each of these areas, we set the context by describing the requirements that AI systems in high-risk domains, and especially in recruitment, should fulfil, as well as the activities that should be carried out to ensure their appropriate use and desired performance, in line with the requirements deriving from the AI Act. Unlike existing horizontal approaches to AI governance and standardisation, this paper contributes a vertical, domain-specific framework for algorithmic hiring, and especially ranking-based recruitment systems, by mapping the requirements of the AI Act to concrete standardisation recommendations, focusing on lifecycle discrimination risks, fairness-aware data governance, explainability, human oversight, and post-deployment monitoring in recruitment systems. Even though our recommendations were informed by the outcomes of the European project FINDHR, they are not tied to the project's technical artefacts and could be implemented using alternative methods, tools, or governance mechanisms.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CYcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-02

Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond

Javier Irigoyen, Roberto Daza, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Ruben Tolosana, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, et al.

The society and emerging risk-based regulatory frameworks for AI underscore the need for rigorous risk assessment to ensure safe and reliable AI systems. In response to this imperative, this paper presents an overview of AI risk assessment (identification and analysis) and manage…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-10

TrustX Agent Risk Classification Framework (ARC): Risk-Tiering Internally Created Agentic AI Systems

Hannah M. Liu, Rhea Saxena, Shiv Asthana

The proliferation of agentic AI systems across enterprise and public-sector contexts has outpaced the capacity of general-purpose AI risk frameworks to classify and govern them. In this paper, we introduce the TrustX Agent Risk Classification Framework, a structured, repeatable i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DBcs.AI2026-07-20

Natural Language Access to Domain-Specific Metadata: A Reusable Framework for LLM Query Generation

Blake G. Fitch, Cato Elia Kurtz

Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata. We show that when domain vocabulary and semantics are captured in a well-designed Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontol…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-17

Signal-based Model Access Risk Analysis for AI System Operations Security

Maria Mahbub, Steven Young, Amir Sadovnik, Edmon Begoli, Chris Rugenstein, Donald Coulter, et al.

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now ubiquitous across domains such as security, finance, healthcare, consumer technology, and large-scale cloud services, where they process massive volumes of data and make consequential decisions daily. This widespread adoption has creat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-01

Risk Architecture for AI-Native Engineering Teams: An Organizational Framework for Agentic System Governance

Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer

Engineering management research has produced mature frameworks for software risk: ownership by feature, escalation by severity, and assurance by test coverage. These frameworks implicitly assume deterministic behavior, discrete and auditable change events, and clear component-to-…

View free PDFSource page