CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.MAcs.LG2026-07-20

Decentralized Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Resilient Critical Infrastructures

Minghui Ding, Evangelos Pournaras

Critical infrastructures are increasingly distributed, interdependent, and exposed to evolving disruptions, making resilience a central requirement for their operation and control. This paper argues that decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) should be understood not merely as a distributed alternative to centralized training with decentralized execution but as a paradigm structurally aligned with the requirements of resilient critical infrastructures. This perspective is grounded in an analysis of the properties of decentralized MARL and the requirements of critical infrastructures, including scalability to large numbers of agents, support for privacy and local autonomy, robustness to failures, and interaction-driven adaptation among interdependent components. However, structural alignment alone is insufficient for practical deployment. This paper identifies credit assignment and communication as two central conditions for its practical feasibility. Credit assignment determines whether local learning remains aligned with system-level objectives, while communication determines whether coordination can be learned and maintained under realistic operational constraints. Building on these challenges, this paper proposes a research agenda focused on structure-aware, causality-aware, and resilience-aware credit assignment; communication for both coordination and credit assignment; and safe, timely, and recoverable decentralized learning under deployment constraints. Overall, this paper reframes decentralized MARL as a promising but conditional foundation for resilient critical infrastructures.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-24

PinEqualizer: Full Funnel Content Exploration and Debiasing System at Pinterest

Olafur Gudmundsson, Bo Zhao, Huayi Liao, Anna Kiyantseva, Sai Xiao, Heath Vinicombe, et al.

In this paper, we propose a new solution for addressing the content cold-start problem in industry-scale search and recommender systems. Compared to prior approaches, we have made the following new contributions: 1) our solution spans the entire multi-stage funnel and generalizes…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-07-24

Dysphagia Risk Stratification in Head and Neck Cancer via Two-Stage PRO-Clinical Stacking

Siyuan Zhao, Eric Ababio Anyimadu, Zachary G. Brumm, Yue Ma, Clifton David Fuller, Xinhua Zhang, et al.

Dysphagia is a debilitating late effect of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment, yet timely identification of at-risk patients remains challenging in survivorship care. Definitive assessment relies on videofluoroscopic imaging, as captured by the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.NIcs.MAeess.SY2026-07-24

Predictive Lightweight MARL for Resilient Coverage in Sparse-Signaling Aerial Networks

Chuan-Chi Lai, Ang-Hsun Tsai

This letter proposes the Predictive Lightweight Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (PL-MARL) framework to ensure resilient coverage in bandwidth-constrained UAV swarms. To counter coordination collapse caused by sparse signaling and information aging, we introduce a Kinematic-Awa…

View free PDFSource page
arxivquant-phcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-24

Quantum Spectral Model: Data Reuploading with Input-Conditioned Frequency Support

Peiyong Wang, Udaya Parampalli, Casey R. Myers

A central design principle in modern machine learning and artificial intelligence is to align a model's inductive bias with the structure of its input data. For matrix-valued inputs, relevant matrix-level relationships can be characterised through spectral values and spectral sub…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.AIcs.LGecon.EM2026-07-24

CausalForge: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference

Jiyuan Tan, Vasilis Syrgkanis

Automating theoretical research is constrained not only by the generation of candidate results, but also by their reliable evaluation. A common approach is to close the research loop with a large language model (LLM) reviewer. However, such reviewers remain empirically unreliable…

View free PDFSource page