CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-15

Consensus as Privileged Context for Label-Free Self-Distillation

John Gkountouras, Josip Jukić, Ivan Titov

Sampling multiple solutions and returning the majority answer is among the most reliable ways to improve the reasoning accuracy of large language models without labels, and a growing family of methods converts this consensus signal into training supervision. However, existing approaches use consensus only in restricted forms: as a filter that selects solutions for fine-tuning, as a preference between answers, or as a scalar reward for reinforcement learning, discarding most of the information that the agreeing solutions contain. We present CANON (Consensus-ANchored self-distillatiON), a label-free training method that turns consensus into dense, token-level supervision. For each unlabeled prompt, CANON samples multiple solutions, extracts the majority answer, and conditions a frozen snapshot of the model on a solution that reaches it; this consensus-anchored teacher then supervises the model on its own rollouts at every token. Experiments on mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks show that CANON improves pass@1 by up to 12 points, outperforming label-free reinforcement learning by 6 points at a seventh of its compute and approaching a teacher conditioned on gold solutions; trained on pooled unlabeled data, it transfers to held-out benchmarks, matching training methods that use gold labels. Analysis suggests that the improvements are not pure distribution sharpening: after training, the model solves problems it previously never solved in 32 attempts, and its majority vote itself becomes more accurate.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-06-30

QVal: Cheaply Evaluating Dense Supervision Signals for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Sergio Hernández-Gutiérrez, Matteo Merler, Ilze Amanda Auzina, Joschka Strüber, Ameya Prabhu, Matthias Bethge

LLM agents increasingly act over long horizons, where a single trajectory can contain hundreds or thousands of actions. In these settings, outcome-only rewards provide too sparse guidance, failing to inform the model about the goodness of intermediate actions. Dense supervision m…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

Distill to Detect: Exposing Stealth Biases in LLMs through Cartridge Distillation

Shayan Talaei, Abhinav Chinta, Devvrit Khatri, Amin Karbasi, Azalia Mirhoseini, Amin Saberi

Language models deployed in high-stakes roles can potentially favor certain entities, brands, or viewpoints, steering user decisions at scale. Such preferential biases can be introduced by any actor in the model's supply chain and are most dangerous when the model reveals its pre…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MM2026-07-01

ESC: Emotional Self-Correction for Reliable Vision-Language Models

Tien-Huy Nguyen, Minh-Nhat Nguyen, Nguyen Nhat Huy, Hung Viet Nguyen, Huy Nguyen Minh Nhat, Thanh-Huy Nguyen, et al.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to unreliable reasoning. Existing self-correction methods mitigate these issues but typically rely on post-training or carefully engineered feedback, incurri…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-21

Knowledge-Centric Self-Improvement

Xuefei Julie Wang, Lauren Hyoseo Yoon, Chengrui Qu, Amanda Zichang Wang, Atharva Sehgal, Eric Mazumdar, et al.

Self-improving AI systems typically treat the agent as the object that improves, by optimizing prompts, workflows, harnesses, or even the agent's own code. This agent-centric view can make improvements expensive to maintain and difficult to transfer, because gains become tied to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-05

Detecting Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (GASP)

Mohamed Aly Bouke

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) reduces but does not eliminate hallucination, and existing detectors return a single answer-level score that does not indicate which sentence is unsupported, or why. To close this gap, we introduce Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (…

View free PDFSource page