CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.HC2026-07-06

From Conversation to Contribution: Characterizing Coding Agent in Open-Source Software

Zihan Fang, Yueke Zhang, Ningzhi Tang, Collin McMillan, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Yu Huang

AI coding assistants such as GitHub Copilot and Cursor have evolved from code-suggestion tools into conversational collaborators, enabling vibe-coding workflows in which developers guide AI-generated code through natural-language dialogue. Although researchers have increasingly recognized the importance of AI coding agents and begun examining their impact on open-source development, a comprehensive understanding of how developers' chat-based interactions with AI relate to subsequent open-source development and collaboration remains limited. This hinders efforts to effectively design, evaluate, and govern AI-assisted open-source software development. To address this gap, we collected 13,360 AI conversation sessions comprising 79,172 user messages from 1,356 OSS repositories, linked them to repository development histories, and complemented this analysis with a targeted developer survey. We find heavier AI use in smaller, less mature, and less collaborative repositories. After AI adoption, projects tended to show more active contributors and lower contributor concentration (p < .001), although communication remained highly concentrated. Code Writing was the dominant chat purpose, and nearly all AI chat sessions were followed by subsequent commits. We find no broad deterioration in code-quality signals or pull request merging rates. However, developers perceive others' AI-generated code as harder to maintain than their own (p = .029) and view AI as lowering barriers to OSS contribution. While most developers (68%) are willing to share their chat, concerns remain around appearing incompetent, increasing reviewer burden, and exposing ideas to competitors. These findings provide a large-scale empirical characterization of AI-assisted OSS contribution and offer practical insights for designing and governing responsible vibe-coding practices in open-source development.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.HCcs.SE2026-07-16

Setup Complete, Now You Are Compromised: Weaponizing Setup Instructions Against AI Coding Agents

Aadesh Bagmar, Pushkar Saraf

AI coding agents set up projects by reading documentation and installing the dependencies it lists, without verifying their names, sources, or known vulnerabilities. By editing only a README, requirements file, or Makefile, an attacker can redirect the agent to an untrusted regis…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-01

Adoption and Impact of Command-Line AI Coding Agents: A Study of Microsoft's Early 2026 Rollout of Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI

Emerson Murphy-Hill, Jenna Butler, Alexandra Savelieva

Organizations rolling out agentic command line tools like Anthropic's Claude Code and GitHub's Copilot CLI need to know who will try them, who will keep using them, and whether the tools produce enough output to justify their cost. At organizational scale, token spend can run int…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-07

Agents That Teach: Towards Designing Incidental Learning Back into AI-Assisted Software Development

Rohit Mehra, Samdyuti Suri, Prithviraj K Tagadinamani, Kapil Singi, Vikrant Kaulgud, Adam P. Burden

AI coding agents are rapidly reshaping how software is built, with developers increasingly delegating substantial coding tasks to autonomous agents in pursuit of higher productivity. While these gains are real, they come at the cost of incidental learning. Developers historically…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HCcs.MAcs.SE2026-07-23

HiMe: Real-Time Self-Hosted Personal Agent Platform for Health Insights with Wearable Devices

Wei Liu, Siya Qi, Linhai Zhang, Lorainne Tudor Car, Yulan He

Traditional approaches to wearable health signal analysis, such as smartwatches, are constrained by rigid analytical frameworks and limited personalisation. The emergence of LLM agents creates a new opportunity for Personal Health Agentic Analysis, where health insights can be ge…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-07

Prompt Coach: An Empirical Evaluation of an Agentic Tutor for Learning Prompt Engineering in Software Development

Rohit Mehra, Kapil Singi, Vikrant Kaulgud, Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Swapnajeet Gon Choudhury, Swati Sharma, et al.

Prompt engineering has emerged as a critical yet undertaught skill for software developers, one that traditional learning approaches are ill-equipped to support given its evolving, interactive, and context-dependent nature. In this paper, we introduce Prompt Coach (PC), an agenti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.HCcs.SE2026-06-29

Rehearsed Multi-Agent Live Product Demonstrations with Real-Time Voice Question Answering

Rahul Khedar, Mayank Malhotra, Avinash Karn, Mouli V, Prakhar Mehrotra

Live product demonstrations are a recurring, high-cost activity in software organizations: a human presenter must select features, dispatch the corresponding interactions on a running application, narrate them coherently, and answer questions in real time. Existing automation add…

View free PDFSource page