CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-22

Bayesian uncertainty estimation improves clinical decision making in medical AI agents

Frederik Hauke, Patrick Wienholt, Christiane Kuhl, Dyke Ferber, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn

Machine learning models for medical image analysis typically lack a reliable measure of confidence, limiting their use in ambiguous or atypical cases. Here we show that Monte Carlo dropout, applied to a multi-task chest-radiograph classifier (eight thoracic findings, 137,593 training images), provides an epistemic uncertainty signal that tracks generalisation across training-set scales and flags confident yet error-prone predictions. Adding this signal to the point prediction raised error-detection AUROC from 0.74 to 0.77 ($Δ$AUROC +0.023, 95% CI [+0.014, +0.033]). In a controlled 2x2 factorial experiment, a clinical-decision-support agent exploited this uncertainty only when it was delivered as a binary error-risk flag rather than as raw scores, cutting confident misdiagnoses on unreliable findings from 8.5% to 2.7%. Epistemic uncertainty estimation thus carries decision-relevant information beyond point predictions, but its value for downstream agents depends on how it is communicated.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-07

Norm Enforcement for AI Agents: Robustly Shaping Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems

Yaowen Ye, Jacob Steinhardt

AI agents are increasingly deployed in shared environments where they pursue diverse goals and compete for rewards. This multi-agent competition can lead to behaviors that serve individual gains at collective cost -- for instance, marketing agents may post misleading content as a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-24

TRACE-ROUTER: Task-Consistent and Adaptive Online Routing for Agentic AI

Ritik Raj, Souvik Kundu, Sarbartha Banerjee, Dheemanth Joshi, Ishita Vohra, Tushar Krishna

Routing to select large language models (LLMs) with different cost-quality trade-offs has become a fundamental deployment feature of enterprise AI. Existing routers, primarily make independent routing decisions for each LLM call. However, agentic applications execute as long-hori…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-21

Knowledge-Centric Self-Improvement

Xuefei Julie Wang, Lauren Hyoseo Yoon, Chengrui Qu, Amanda Zichang Wang, Atharva Sehgal, Eric Mazumdar, et al.

Self-improving AI systems typically treat the agent as the object that improves, by optimizing prompts, workflows, harnesses, or even the agent's own code. This agent-centric view can make improvements expensive to maintain and difficult to transfer, because gains become tied to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-08

Multi-Agent AI Control: Distributed Attacks Hamper Per-Instance Monitors

Oliver Makins, Orazio Angelini, Zohreh Shams, Mary Phuong

AI control is a family of techniques to prevent an AI with malicious goals from subverting its operator's intent. AI Control usually studies a single agent in one trajectory, but real deployments run many agents over shared infrastructure, and the most severe risks (model-weight…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.ETcs.LGcs.MAecon.GN2026-07-09

SolarChain-Eval: A Physics-Constrained Benchmark for Trustworthy Economic Agents in Decentralized Energy Markets

Shilin Ou, Yifan Xu, Luyao Zhang

As agentic AI systems are increasingly applied to cyber-physical environments, their evaluation requires assessment of both task performance and trustworthiness. In decentralized energy markets, autonomous agents may improve market utility, but may also exploit invalid physical d…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-06

Relational Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing in High-Speed Railway Markets

Enrique Adrian Villarrubia-Martin, David Muñoz-Valero, Luis Rodriguez-Benitez, Giovanni Montana, Luis Jimenez-Linares

In liberalised railway systems, operators must set prices dynamically in an environment with partial observability, as they retain private information about their objectives and performance, where regulatory constraints prohibit communication or direct information exchange betwee…

View free PDFSource page