CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-01

Self-Evolving Agents with Anytime-Valid Certificates

Biswa Sengupta

Self-evolving agents violate the assumption behind most learning-theoretic guarantees: the data, evaluator, components, and hypothesis space are produced by the policy being updated. We present \textbf{SEA}, an architecture that confines self-modification to a small steering adapter and a versioned harness around a \emph{frozen} base model and admits each modification only through an anytime-valid gate that emits an auditable certificate against a fixed error budget. Five loop controllers compose published guarantees; because such gates can only \emph{select} among behaviors the frozen base already produces, five verifier-in-the-loop mechanisms -- best-of-$N$, micro-step search, self-authored reproduction oracles, search-layer control, and self-repair -- supply the dense, grader-free signal the gates require, computed from the issue text alone. On a $52$-instance SWE-bench Verified subset across four base models, base capability is the dominant, confound-free effect, and on two strong base models a deliberate no-op-composite control isolates the suite's contribution at $+4$ and $+5$ (\textsc{Glm}~5.2 $24\to28$; \textsc{Gpt} $29\to34$, the $65\%$ best), with event logs confirming that its mechanisms fire and prevent regressions. Results are single-run on expensive evaluations; confirming run-to-run variance and adapting the per-task algorithm mix are future work.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

SkillCoach: Self-Evolving Rubrics for Evaluating and Enhancing Agentic Skill-Use

Jiayin Zhu, Kelong Mao, Yudong Guo, Dengbo He, Sulong Xu, Simiu Gu, et al.

Skills are becoming a reusable operational layer for LLM agents, encoding SOPs, domain rules, tool workflows, scripts, and validation routines. In realistic skill repositories, overlapping skills make reliable skill-use difficult. Final verifier success is too coarse for both eva…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-08

From Atomic Actions to Standard Operating Procedures: Iterative Tool Optimization for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Haipeng Ding, Yuexiang Xie, Zhewei Wei, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding

Tool utilization enables Large Language Model (LLM) agents to interact with the real world and resolve complex tasks. However, existing agent frameworks predominantly rely on static toolsets composed of granular atomic actions (e.g., basic file I/O or single-turn search), which f…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-08

The Blind Curator: How a Biased Judge Silently Disables Skill Retirement in Self-Evolving Agents

Xing Zhang, Yanwei Cui, Guanghui Wang, Ziyuan Li, Wei Qiu, Bing Zhu, et al.

A self-evolving agent retires its bad skills by watching them fail, so what happens when the judge cannot see the failures? Skill retirement is the structural constraint that keeps a growing library from drifting below the no-skill baseline, but its guarantee assumes an unbiased…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.GRcs.MA2026-07-17

Clarify Before Executing: A Self-Evolving Agent for Resolving Intent Asymmetry in 3D Tool Orchestration

Xiaoye Zhu, Weixin Li, Junan Huo, Bozhong Wang, Jia Zeng, Yi Yang, et al.

A fundamental intent asymmetry plagues modern 3D asset creation: while state-of-the-art 3D toolchains demand precise, executable parameters, ordinary users typically provide vague, underspecified instructions. Current 3D agents treat this ambiguity as noise, defaulting to blind e…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-06-29

SEVA: Self-Evolving Verification Agent with Process Reward for Fact Attribution

Aojie Yuan, Yi Nian, Haiyue Zhang, Zijian Su, Yue Zhao

Hallucination is the reliability bottleneck for LLM-based agents, and fact attribution verifiers are the last line of defense -- yet today's verifiers emit only opaque binary labels, leaving agents unable to self-correct and operators unable to audit. We present SEVA, a structure…

View free PDFSource page