CORTEXA
← Browse
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23Cited by 2

The Warranty Axis: How Publishers Govern the Human-Reserved Core of AI-Assisted Authorship

K. Yamada

A companion study to a prior analysis of publisher generative-AI policies found that major publishers converge on reserving a set of functions for human authors: verification, evidential judgment, interpretation, final approval, responsibility for correction, and legal and ethical answerability (Yamada, 2026a). That study established what publishers reserve. This article asks a different question: how they guard it. Reading the current policies of Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, Sage, and IEEE, it finds that the reserved core, at the level of text, is governed almost entirely as a regime of disclosure and human accountability rather than as a list of forbidden tasks. Genuine text-level prohibition, under which a task may not be performed with AI even when the use is disclosed, appears at only one of the six publishers; two others bar the substitution of the author rather than the assistance of AI. Five of the six publishers explicitly prohibit AI-generated or AI-altered primary research images; IEEE instead governs them through disclosure, while ordinary research-integrity rules continue to prohibit the falsification of primary data. The article names the dimension along which the core is defined the warranty axis: what a publisher reserves is the obligation that a competent human warrant the resulting claims, rather than a set of tasks that machines may not touch. The warranty axis is the predominant dimension along which the text-level reserved core is governed; disclosure and prohibition are its two principal encodings, though some task-specific prohibitions rest on additional grounds. The reading clarifies rather than weakens the earlier finding, since a coredefined as warranty does not collapse when disclosed assistance is permitted. The article also notes that the principal boundary around primary research images tracks falsification rather than AI use and is itself in motion, and that permission stated at the publisher level need not coincide with the standards individual journals, editors, and reviewers apply.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-24

Show Your Work: From Disclosing AI Use to Demonstrating Rigour. A Worked Case and a Contributor-Role Standard for AI-Assisted Scholarship

Johan Locke

Background. Publishing has settled on one answer to generative AI: an AI cannot be an author, and its use must be disclosed. Problem. Disclosure asks the wrong question. A statement that AI was used cannot be falsified in either direction, and a large recent study suggests it is…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-26

AI-Assisted Immersive Discovery of Viability

Serhii Hostiunin

immersive discovery of viability as a new direction in the development of intelligent scientific environments within the framework of Vitology. The proposed approach combines immersive technologies, artificial intelligence, digital twins, interactive simulation, multidimensional…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-26

Output Management Plan For Its Honesty and Integrity

K. Yamada

July 25, 2026. Paper Permission: What Publisher AI Policies Allow and Practice Withholds AFS3.6: Paper Permission: What Publisher AI Policies Allow and Practice Withholds Names Paper Permission: a permission present in the text of publisher policy and largely absent from open pra…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23

The Process Is the Product: A Human-Directed, Multi-Model Adversarial Workflow for Trustworthy AI-Assisted Research

Dan Lee-Odinson

This paper reports a single-operator case study in directing several artificial-intelligence systems through a disciplined research and software-development process, and argues a narrow thesis: that the process—the documented, reproducible, accountable workflow—is a product in it…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-25

Design and Development of AI-Assisted UAV for Smart Campus Crowd Analytics and Anomaly Detection

Sam Philip, Pandian P

Abstract: This paper focuses on a self-sufficient UAV-supported monitoring system that can be used to improve smart campus security through real-time crowd analytics and anomaly detection. The system combines a quadrotor drone with a Pixhawk flight controller, a u-blox M10 GPS mo…

View free PDFSource page