CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-06-30

Mnemosyne: Agentic Transaction Processing for Validating and Repairing AI-generated Workflows

Edward Y. Chang, Longling Geng, Emily J. Chang

LLMs increasingly generate workflow actions, repairs, and plans, but a generated action may be syntactically valid yet stale, infeasible, conflicting, or destructive of the evidence that triggered a repair. We introduce Agentic Transaction Processing (ATP), a transaction model that treats generated actions as untrusted proposals until they pass deterministic admission under a declared, executable constraint set C. The governing principle is two-sided: a proposal is not truth, and no proposal foresees every disruption. Anything may propose, but only the runtime admits and commits; when an unforeseen disruption strikes, it repairs reactively within bounds rather than trusting a fresh proposal. Relative to C, committed-state correctness becomes independent of the competence, honesty, or learning of the proposing layer. We realize ATP in Mnemosyne, a runtime with an append-only transition log, effective-state projection, dependency-safe compensation, and active commitment records, and prove four safety properties relative to C (authority separation, serial-equivalent generative admission, evidence-preserving repair, and obligation containment) plus a bounded-reactive-repair guarantee (LCRP). A reproducible artifact rejects the targeted violations across nine falsification tests while still admitting valid work, at under 6% overhead, and local repair edits an order of magnitude fewer operations than global recompute. In live-proposer pilots, 80 static plan-entry and mid-execution repair proposals from four heterogeneous LLMs pass the same admission boundary, scored by an external cross-episode harness with zero invalid commits; the gate admits 24 of 40 live repair proposals and rejects 16, four as explicit safety rejections of over-broad rollback. Mnemosyne is open source: https://github.com/eyuchang/Mnemosyne/tree/mnemosyne-atp-postgres-rerun

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-08Cited by 2

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies

Kiarash Ahi, Saeed Valizadeh

Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI (GenAI) systems, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, Copilot, Stable Diffusion by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Stability AI, respectively, are revolutionizing cybersecurity, enabling both automated defense and soph…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-15

Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)

Shahin Hossain, Tukhbita Afroz Nawmi

As generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in undergraduate academic writing, how students rely on these tools, rather than simply whether they use them, has become a central question for learning, academic integrity, and educational equity. Existing measures of relia…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.OS2026-07-20

TRIM: Reducing AI-Generated CodeSlop via Agent Trajectory Minimization

Alex Mathai, Shobini Iyer, Aleksandr Nogikh, Petros Maniatis, Franjo Ivancic, Junfeng Yang, et al.

Coding agents are increasingly used to accelerate code generation in many downstream tasks, such as fixing bugs, building applications, and prototyping. However, despite their value as coding assistants, agent-generated code tends to be larger and more verbose than the correspond…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-17

Automated Hardware Validation Test Plan Generation for Large Scale AI Datacenter Platforms Using a Generative AI Multi-Agents Architecture

Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Saurabh Kulkarni, Prathamesh Kulkarni, Rohan Kulkarni, Sangwon Yoon, Daehan Won

Large-scale AI datacenter platforms comprise thousands of heterogeneous hardware components whose validation requires comprehensive fault injection test plans. Today these plans are authored manually: engineers review hardware self-healing validation documents and bills of materi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CY2026-06-26

Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images

Negar Kamali, Candice Rockell Gerstner, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh

Across social and online platforms, people are increasingly exposed to AI-generated images. As a consequence, the task of distinguishing AI-generated from authentic images is becoming a central challenge for information ecosystems. While humans perform better than chance, accurac…

View free PDFSource page