CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.PF2026-07-10

Attention to Detail: Evaluating Energy, Performance, and Accuracy Trade-offs Across vLLM Configurations

Nada Zine, Tristan Coignion, Vincenzo Stoico, Clément Quinton, Ivano Malavolta, Romain Rouvoy, Patricia Lago

Large Language Models are reshaping how software is developed and maintained. They are typically deployed in production using inference engines such as vLLM, which can efficiently serve pre-trained, highly configurable models. While prior work has focused on model architectures and hardware acceleration, the impact of inference engine configuration on energy consumption, performance, and output quality remains poorly understood. In this paper, we present a large-scale controlled study of three selected vLLM configuration options: attention kernel type, prefix caching, and chunked prefill. We evaluate all combinations of these configurations across 5 open-weight LLMs and 5 diverse inference tasks, totaling $9,000$ runs and $93,600$ measures. We analyze energy consumption, latency, and accuracy, and examine both main effects and interaction effects between configuration options and tasks. Our results show that the studied configuration options significantly impact energy and performance, mainly driven by attention type and prefix caching, while chunked prefill has a limited effect under the default vLLM serving configuration and evaluated workloads. These effects are highly model- and workload-dependent, and no configuration is universally optimal. We further show that model choice dominates global trade-offs, while configuration tuning provides local improvements along the Pareto frontier. Unexpectedly, inference options can also affect model accuracy.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LGcs.PF2026-07-16

AEVAL: From Anecdotal to Deterministic Testing for Agentic Skill Workflows

Tejas Singh Anand, Yuet Ying Christina Wang, Wanting Jiang, Steve Masson, Tian Zheng, Bingjie Zhou

Modern agentic systems increasingly rely on skills: installable packages of natural language and code that teach an LLM agent to perform a domain task. As skill repositories grow, developers need automated quality signals on every change, yet evaluation today is largely anecdotal…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-06-27

Reward-Free Code Alignment from Pretrained or Fine-Tuned LLM: Unpacking the Trade-offs for Code Generation

Sanjeepan Sivapiran, Gias Uddin

Large Language Model (LLM) alignment trains an LLM using preference data to produce outputs that better meet established quality standards. While LLM alignment techniques are studied for non-coding tasks, we know little about their usefulness for coding tasks. It is unclear wheth…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-16

MCPEvol-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agent Performance Across Dynamic Evolutions of MCP Servers

Huanxi Liu, Kun Hu, Jiaqi Liao, Qiang Wang, Pengfei Qian, YuanZhao Zhai, et al.

As Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers emerge as the core infrastructure for connecting LLMs with external tools, existing benchmarks leverage real-world MCP servers to evaluate LLM agents' tool-using capabilities. However, these benchmarks overlook the continuous evolution of t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DCcs.AIcs.PF2026-07-10

STEEL: Sparsity-Aware Fused Attention for Energy-Efficient Long-Sequence Inference on AMD's XDNA NPU

Victor J. B. Jung, Gagandeep Singh, Joseph Melber, Kristof Denolf, Francesco Conti, Luca Benini

The growing adoption of large language model-based agents within operating system workflows has increased the importance of energy-efficient inference on laptop-class systems-on-chip (SoCs). While cloud offloading remains common, it introduces reliability and privacy concerns tha…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.DB2026-06-28

SAKE: Software Architectural Knowledge Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

Tiziano Santilli, Francesco Daghero, Mayhar Tourchi Moghaddam

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as assistants across the software development lifecycle, yet their ability to reason about software architecture remains largely unmeasured. Architectural decision-making depends on quality attribute trade-offs, design patterns,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-06-28

Citation Discipline in Spec-Driven Development: A Cross-Model Empirical Study of Output Determinism and Automated Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated Code

Subham Panda

Spec-Driven Development (SDD) frameworks guide Large Language Model (LLM)-powered code generation through formal specifications, yet they differ fundamentally in how they enforce traceability between requirements and generated code. This paper presents two controlled empirical st…

View free PDFSource page