CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-06-25

PairSAE: Mechanistic Interpretability from Pair Representations in Protein Co-Folding

Giosue Migliorini, Aristofanis Rontogiannis, Grigori Guitchounts, Nicholas Franklin, Axel Elaldi, Olivia Viessmann

Foundation models for structural biology have achieved remarkable performance in predicting biomolecular structure and show promise for the design of proteins and small molecules. Yet understanding which internal features drive their outputs remains challenging. Standard sparse autoencoders (SAEs), effective on transformer-style sequence embeddings, do not transfer cleanly to pairformer-like architectures: naively operating on pairwise representations yields a quadratic blow-up of features and obscures concepts distributed jointly across sequence and pair representations. We introduce PairSAE, which summarizes pairwise tensors via an N-mode SVD into token-wise interaction roles, then uses a sparse autoencoder to learn a shared set of token-level features that decode into both sequence and pair representations. Evaluated on Boltz-2 activations for PLINDER protein-ligand complexes, PairSAE yields interpretable features that align with UniProt annotations and predict Boltz-2 affinity values. These results indicate that PairSAE links the latent space of foundation models for structural biology to interpretable structural concepts, clarifying what the model "knows" while avoiding pairformer-induced pitfalls that limit conventional SAEs.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LG2026-06-30

Representation as a Bottleneck for Mechanistic Interpretability: The Manifestation Unit Protocol

Hussein Chouman, Wataru Sasaki, Tomokazu Matsui, Hirohiko Suwa, Keiichi Yasumoto

Mechanistic interpretability has produced a rich inventory of component-level analyses that characterise what neural-network components encode and how they interact. Their outputs, however, are not easily reusable: selectivity tables, circuit diagrams, and feature lists remain lo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-07-09

Certified Interventional Fidelity: Anytime-Valid, Adaptive Evaluation of Causal Claims in Mechanistic Interpretability

Amir Asiaee

Mechanistic interpretability often evaluates explanations by intervening on a model: swapping hidden states, patching activations, ablating components, or comparing a compressed model to the original one. These experiments are usually summarized by a point estimate, even though t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivquant-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-elcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

Mechanistic Interpretability and Causal Feature Steering of Neural Quantum States via Sparse Autoencoders

Zihao Qi, Christopher Earls

Neural Quantum States (NQS) are a remarkably expressive class of variational ansätze for quantum many-body wavefunctions, yet little is understood about their internal mechanisms: trained on variational objectives alone, how do NQS accurately capture physical observables that the…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-07-08

Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning

Pranav Sawant, Jakub Krejčí

This article offers a comprehensive overview of mechanistic interpretability, an emerging field that seeks to reverse-engineer the internal algorithms of modern neural networks. While traditional explainable AI methods often stop at surface-level input-output correlations, this a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LGeess.SYmath.OC2026-07-16

Steering Robustness into World Action Models via Mechanistic Interpretability and Optimal Control

Jihoon Hong, Julian Skifstad, Qiyue Dai, Alice Chan, Glen Chou

World Action Models (WAMs) enable semantically- and physically-informed control but are brittle under distribution shift. In this work, we use mechanistic interpretability to study how robustness-relevant perturbations are represented in WAM activation space. Comparing activation…

View free PDFSource page