CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIstat.ME2026-07-23

Detecting LLM-Generated Tokens in Human--LLM Coauthored Text

Yangjun Lu, Hongyi Zhou, Fabian Spill, Kai Ye, Chengchun Shi, Jin Zhu

The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents. Existing methods for detecting LLM-generated text mainly focus on document-level classification and cannot identify which parts of the text are generated by LLMs. This paper introduces a new method to address this urgent need. Our method operates at the token level, the natural unit of modern language models, and builds on existing token-level detection scores. The key idea is to smooth adjacent token scores to reduce their variability, while using an adaptive Lepski-type rule to select the bandwidth according to the local authorship structure. Our method is simple to implement and does not require token-level labeled data for training. Theoretically, we characterize this trade-off and show that the proposed method achieves favorable mean square error performance in estimating the underlying signal. Empirically, we demonstrate strong performance of our method against a wide range of baselines in both synthetic datasets and a realistic dataset. We deploy a publicly accessible website that implements the methods as well.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIstat.ME2026-07-17

Nonuniformity Principle in Human-AI Coworking

An Luo, Jie Ding

As generative AI is increasingly applied to automate multi-step and high-stake workflows, human judgment and involvement remain essential for ensuring the quality of AI-generated outputs. In practice, while it is desirable for human experts to provide oversight on AI regularly, o…

View free PDFSource page
arxivecon.EMcs.AIstat.ME2026-07-08

Sensitivity to Subjective Expected Utility Maximization: A Methodological Study, with an Illustrative Application to LLM Decision-Making

Jeff Helzner

Evaluating decisions made under uncertainty is hard when labeled outcomes are scarce, costly, or confounded with luck. We treat subjective expected utility (SEU) maximization as a stated standard and define a graded measure -- SEU sensitivity -- of an agent's conformity to it. Th…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MEcs.AIecon.EM2026-06-29

HERO: Improving the Reliability and Sensitivity of Generative Model Evaluation Using Historical Data

Xinrui Ruan, Zhenyu Zhao, Waverly Wei, Yueshan Zhang, Zeyu Zheng, Sui Huang, et al.

Reliable generative AI models critically rely on expert human annotations to evaluate output quality, yet these "gold" labels are expensive to collect and limited in quantity. Organizations thus often turn to collecting vast but noisy "silver" labels from crowdsourced workers or…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.MAstat.ME2026-07-03

Silicon Sampling via Cross-Survey Transfer

Chan-Tung Ku, Chan Hsu, Pei-Cing Huang, Frank Cheng-shan Liu, I-Ling Cheng, Yihuang Kang

Silicon sampling-using large language models (LLMs) to simulate human survey respondents-has emerged as a promising approach for augmenting traditional survey research. However, most evaluations rely on distributional comparisons rather than individual-level prediction, which ris…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIquant-phstat.ME2026-07-19

Auditing Question-Order Effects in Large Language Models with the QQ Equality: Mechanism Characterization and a Saturation Caveat

Pilsung Kang

Human survey respondents exhibit question-order effects that satisfy the QQ (quantum question) equality, an a priori, parameter-free prediction of the projective quantum question-order model. We develop the QQ equality into an audit criterion for sequential judgments of autoregre…

View free PDFSource page