CORTEXA
← Browse
crossrefRemote Sensing2025-05-15Cited by 13

Retrieving Inland Water Quality Parameters via Satellite Remote Sensing: Sensor Evaluation, Atmospheric Correction, and Machine Learning Approaches

Mohsen Ansari, Anders Knudby, Meisam Amani, Michael Sawada

Satellite remote sensing provides a cost-effective and large-scale alternative to traditional methods for retrieving water quality parameters for inland waters. Effective water quality parameter retrieval via optical satellite remote sensing requires three key components: (1) a sensor whose measurements are sensitive to variations in water quality; (2) accurate atmospheric correction to eliminate the effect of absorption and scattering in the atmosphere and retrieve the water-leaving radiance/reflectance; and (3) a bio-optical model used to estimate water quality from the optical signal. This study provides a literature review and an evaluation of these three components. First, a review of decommissioned, active, and upcoming satellite sensors is presented, highlighting their advantages and limitations, and a ranking method is introduced to assess their suitability for retrieving chlorophyll-a, colored dissolved organic matter, and non-algal particles in inland waters. This ranking can aid in selecting appropriate sensors for future studies. Second, the strengths and weaknesses of atmospheric correction algorithms used over inland waters are examined. The results show that no atmospheric correction algorithm performed consistently across all conditions. However, understanding their strengths and weaknesses allows users to select the most suitable algorithm for a specific use case. Third, the challenges, limitations, and recent advances of machine learning use in bio-optical models for inland water quality parameter retrieval are discussed. Machine learning models have limitations, including low generalizability, low dimensionality, spatial/temporal autocorrelation, and information leakage. These issues highlight the importance of locally trained models, rigorous cross-validation methods, and integrating auxiliary data to enhance dimensionality. Finally, recommendations for promising research directions are provided.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

crossrefRemote Sensing2024-03-12Cited by 5

Characterizing Water Composition with an Autonomous Robotic Team Employing Comprehensive In Situ Sensing, Hyperspectral Imaging, Machine Learning, and Conformal Prediction

John Waczak, Adam Aker, Lakitha O. H. Wijeratne, Shawhin Talebi, Ashen Fernando, Prabuddha M. H. Dewage, et al.

Inland waters pose a unique challenge for water quality monitoring by remote sensing techniques due to their complicated spectral features and small-scale variability. At the same time, collecting the reference data needed to calibrate remote sensing data products is both time co…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefRemote Sensing2023-10-13Cited by 6

Enhancing Water Depth Estimation from Satellite Images Using Online Machine Learning: A Case Study Using Baidu Easy-DL with Acoustic Bathymetry and Sentinel-2 Data

Zhongqiang Wu, Shulei Wu, Haixia Yang, Zhihua Mao, Wei Shen

Water depth estimation is paramount in various domains, including navigation, environmental monitoring, and resource management. Traditional depth measurement methods, such as bathymetry, can often be expensive and time-consuming, especially in remote or inaccessible areas. This…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefRemote Sensing2024-08-22Cited by 5

Enhancing Extreme Precipitation Forecasts through Machine Learning Quality Control of Precipitable Water Data from Satellite FengYun-2E: A Comparative Study of Minimum Covariance Determinant and Isolation Forest Methods

Wenqi Shen, Siqi Chen, Jianjun Xu, Yu Zhang, Xudong Liang, Yong Zhang

Variational data assimilation theoretically assumes Gaussian-distributed observational errors, yet actual data often deviate from this assumption. Traditional quality control methods have limitations when dealing with nonlinear and non-Gaussian-distributed data. To address this i…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefRemote Sensing2024-08-21Cited by 1

Geoclimatic Distribution of Satellite-Observed Salinity Bias Classified by Machine Learning Approach

Yating Ouyang, Yuhong Zhang, Ming Feng, Fabio Boschetti, Yan Du

Sea surface salinity (SSS) observed by satellite has been widely used since the successful launch of the first salinity satellite in 2009. However, compared with other oceanographic satellite products (e.g., sea surface temperature, SST) that became operational in the 1980s, the…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefRemote Sensing2026-07-10

Exploring the Potential of Machine Learning Post-Processing to Generate ERA5-Consistent Atmospheric Profiles from Geostationary Satellite Retrievals

Daehyeon Han, Minki Choo, Sihun Jung, Juhyun Lee, Hyunyoung Choi, Jungho Im

Accurate atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles are fundamental to weather monitoring and prediction. Geostationary imagers such as the Advanced Meteorological Imager (AMI) provide continuous observations and enable profile retrievals through radiative transfer–based algor…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefRemote Sensing2023-09-06Cited by 7

Mapping Buildings across Heterogeneous Landscapes: Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applied to Multi-Modal Remote Sensing Data

Rachel E. Mason, Nicholas R. Vaughn, Gregory P. Asner

We describe the production of maps of buildings on Hawai’i Island, based on complementary information contained in two different types of remote sensing data. The maps cover 3200 km2 over a highly varied set of landscape types and building densities. A convolutional neural networ…

View free PDFSource page