CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-23

Token Budget Saturation and Mechanistic Early Detection of Reasoning Non-Convergence in Chain-of-Thought Models

Renuka Oladri, Niveda Jawahar, Abdirisak Mohamed

Chain-of-thought reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B exhibit a bimodal convergence pattern: generations either terminate within a token budget (converged) or exhaust it without reaching a conclusion (non-converged). We characterize this phenomenon empirically, showing that converged generations achieve 90.3% accuracy on AIME 1983-2024 while non-converged ones achieve only 6.6%, with an overall convergence rate of 62.0%. We then ask whether this outcome is detectable early in the thinking chain using internal model representations. Training linear probes on hidden-state activations at token positions 50-300, we find that layer-20 activations at token 150 achieve AUC 0.608 (+-0.080, 5-fold CV), reliably above chance even at token 50. Activation probes consistently outperform behavioral baselines derived from token entropy and repetition statistics. A sweep-level permutation test yields p=0.063 (100,000 permutations), consistent with a modest signal that our sample size cannot confirm at conventional thresholds. These findings suggest that convergence fate is partially encoded in intermediate representations well before the generation ends, opening a path toward early-exit inference and adaptive compute allocation.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-08

Length Penalties Make Chain-of-Thought Less Monitorable

Bryce Little

Length-penalized reinforcement learning can shorten chain-of-thought reasoning while hiding an influence that drives the model's answer. In our experiments, training with length penalties does not stop misleading hints from steering models, even though the models' chains of thoug…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-06-29

When Does Learning to Stop Help? A Cost-Aware Study of Early Exits in Reasoning Models

Zhe Dong, Fang Qin, Manish Shah

Reasoning models spend test-time compute unevenly across instances, and a growing family of early-exit rules -- confidence thresholds, entropy monitors, answer-stability checks, and learned stoppers -- promises to reclaim the waste. These rules, however, are evaluated under heter…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-06

Retroactive Chain-of-Thought (RetroCoT): Forensic Reconstruction Prompts as a Safety Diagnostic Across Model Generations

Samira Hajizadeh

Safety alignment in large language models is typically evaluated against direct, imperative harmful requests. We show that this alignment is highly conditioned on pragmatic register: models that refuse a direct request frequently comply when the same underlying objective is expre…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-21

LatentMT: Machine Translation with Latent Reasoning

Wei-Rui Chen, Samar M. Magdy, Chiyu Zhang, Wenhui Zhu, Zhipeng Wang, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed

Latent-reasoning looped language models (LoopLMs) offer a different scaling path for machine translation (MT): instead of increasing parameter count or emitting explicit chain-of-thought tokens, they spend additional recurrent computation inside hidden states. We introduce Latent…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-20

MADA-RL: Multi-Agent Debate-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Parameter-Efficient Reasoning in Compact Models

Martino M. L. Pulici, Cuong Xuan Chu, Evgeny Kharlamov, Zifeng Ding, Volker Tresp, Yunpu Ma

Large language models achieve strong reasoning performance, but often at prohibitive training cost - a challenge that is especially acute for compact models ($\leq 4 \, \mathrm{B}$ parameters) trained under limited budgets. We introduce MADA-RL, a post-training framework that spe…

View free PDFSource page