CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-29

Indi-RomCoM: Code-Mixed Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Romanized Indic-English Instructions

Avisha Das, Mihir Parmar, Mohana Ramnath, Pulkit Verma

Romanized Code Mixing (RCM), where bilingual speakers fluidly blend local languages with English in Roman script, has emerged as the dominant form of communication across multilingual communities. While Large Language Models (LLMs) perform strongly on monolingual and native-script benchmarks, their ability to follow instructions and reason over RCM-based content remains largely unexplored. To this end, we introduce the Indi-RomCoM benchmark for facilitating systematic evaluation on Indic Romanized Code-Mixed instructions. Our benchmark spans seven instruction-following tasks, four widely spoken Indic languages, and three controlled code-mixing intensity levels. We extensively evaluate a suite of LLMs covering proprietary, open-weight, and Indic-focused models under zero- and few-shot settings. LLMs consistently underperform on RCM instructions, with performance degrading as code-mixing density increases. Furthermore, reasoning tasks suffer less degradation than detection tasks (e.g., Toxicity) because the generated explanations offer necessary context. We believe Indi-RomCoM helps the community in developing inclusive multilingual systems.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-17

Conditional Reliability of Toxicity Signals for Multilingual and Code-Mixed Abuse Detection

Indraveni Chebolu, Rohan Singh, Arnab Mallick, Harmesh Rana

Moderation systems increasingly rely on external toxicity tools, but those tools are unreliable under code-mixing, transliteration, slang, and language mismatch. We study the \emph{conditional reliability} of toxicity priors in Indian multilingual and code-mixed short text: Engli…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-01

Adversarial Pragmatics for AI Safety Evaluation: A Benchmark for Instruction Conflict, Embedded Commands, and Policy Ambiguity

Brett Reynolds

Safety evaluations for language models increasingly depend on judgments about ambiguous natural-language behaviour: whether a model has followed an instruction, refused appropriately, complied with a policy, resisted an embedded command, or misreported progress in an agentic task…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-14

Code-MUE: Measuring Code LLMs' Uncertainty through Execution-based Semantic Interaction Graphs

Xiaoning Ren, Yinxing Xue, Lei Ma, Yuheng Huang

As Code Large Language Models (LLMs) become central to modern software engineering, their inherent stochasticity poses significant real-world risks, where even minor errors can lead to severe functional, security, or safety consequences. Reliable automation, therefore, demands th…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-25

NuclearQAv2: A Structured Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-Science Competence in Large Language Models

Henry Shaowu Yuchi, Michal Kucer, Benjamin H. Sims, Selma Peterson, Emily Taylor

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of tasks, but ensuring their reliability in highly technical domains remains a significant challenge. In nuclear engineering, problem solving often requires not only factual knowledge but also q…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-07

RuBench: A Repository-Level Agentic Coding Benchmark with Natively Authored Russian Task Specifications

Evgeny Shilov

Developers increasingly delegate real maintenance work to product-grade coding agents, and many state tasks in their native language, in the style of a customer request rather than a curated English issue. We introduce RuBench 1.0, a benchmark of 25 tasks mined from recent fix co…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

Agentic coding without the cloud: evaluating open-weight large language models on longitudinal data preparation tasks

Mack Nixon, Liam Wright, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk, Alison Fang-Wei Wu, Martin Danka, Andy Boyd, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) and agents are now widely used tools in code development, with data typically sent to third-party cloud-based models. Their adoption in research using personal data is constrained by governance requirements that typically prohibit data transmission to…

View free PDFSource page