CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-15

How Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement

Alexandra E. Michael, Franziska Roesner

As AI agents gain prevalence, users are increasingly exposed to the risks such systems entail. Prompt injection attacks, as well as hallucination, can cause agents to leak private information to third parties. As autonomous systems, agents also present the more active danger of performing sensitive tasks, such as bank transactions, without the user's intent or authorization. Recognizing this challenge, the agentic security community has developed numerous proposals for secure agentic systems. Much of this work has focused on product-level approaches, where agentic system developers determine and apply the same security policies and permissions to all users. Yet different users have different needs and preferences, necessitating support for user-level permissions policies in agentic AI systems. To understand how user-level permissions are handled in AI agent systems, we survey 21 proposals for agent permissions systems. From this review, we construct a taxonomy of how different systems specify user-level permissions policies, both at the user interface and internally; derive internal policies from user input; and enforce those policies at run-time. We then analyze five prominent commercial agents and compare their permissions handling to agentic permissions systems in the literature. We identify several high-level themes across the literature and commercial agents, as well as multiple gaps where future work is needed.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-01

Janus: a Playground for User-Involved Agentic Permission Management

Natalie Grace Brigham, Eugene Bagdasarian, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner

AI agents that autonomously execute tool calls on a user's behalf raise pressing questions about permission management: what role could users play, and what role should they play? Despite many proposed approaches, the user's role in agentic permission management remains under exp…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-06

Agent Data Injection Attacks are Realistic Threats to AI Agents

Woohyuk Choi, Juhee Kim, Taehyun Kang, Jihyeon Jeong, Luyi Xing, Byoungyoung Lee

AI agents act on behalf of user prompts, consuming external data and taking actions based on the agent context. Prior research on AI agent security has primarily focused on indirect prompt injection (IPI). Its most well-studied category is instruction injection, where attacker-co…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-24

Dynamic Capability Scoping for Enterprise AI Agents: A Synthetic Dataset and Three-Source Permission Architecture

Halil Burak Noyan

Enterprise AI agents are typically granted static credential sets at configuration time, holding every tool the role might need for every task they perform. This persistent over-privilege expands the attack surface. We argue that capability scoping must follow a dynamic least-pri…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-04

DualView: Preventing Indirect Prompt Injection in Personal AI Agents

Juhee Kim, Woohyuk Choi, Taehyun Kang, Youngmin Kim, Byoungyoung Lee

Personal AI agents that run on the user's local machine, such as OpenClaw, automate daily tasks including web search, email, and file management. Their access to computer resources, including the network, file system, and shell, exposes them to indirect prompt injection (IPI) att…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-16

Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation

Jasmine Brazilek, Maheep Chaudhary, Zoe Lu, Miles Tidmarsh

Multi-agent systems routinely place one AI agent in authority over another. When a subordinate refuses a task, the manager chooses the outcome: it can renegotiate, report the failure honestly, coerce the subordinate, or lie about the result. No benchmark measures which of these a…

View free PDFSource page