CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-16

Show Me How You Reason and I'll Tell You Who You Are: Reasoning Graphs for Robust LLM Authorship Attribution

Zlata Kikteva, Artur Romazanov, Annette Hautli-Janisz, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz

Given the current trend to employ large language models (LLMs) in almost any imaginable context, LLM-generated text detection and authorship attribution have become a pressing issue. Prior work has primarily focused on surface-level linguistic features, an approach shown to be susceptible to paraphrasing and other obfuscation techniques. In this paper, we go beyond the linguistic surface, extracting and analysing reasoning structures in LLM-generated texts with the goal of capturing more complex signals of LLM authorship. We propose a graph neural network approach that leverages reasoning graphs extracted by an argument mining pipeline, demonstrating improved robustness and generalisation over a traditional Longformer baseline. Our approach outperforms the baseline by up to 27 percentage points under the obfuscation attacks such as paraphrasing and backtranslation, and 19 percentage points when evaluated on the texts generated by the unseen model versions, simulating real-world conditions in which new LLM versions are continuously released.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIq-bio.QM2026-06-29

Clinical Reasoning Graphs: Structured Evaluation of LLM Diagnostic Reasoning Reveals Competence Without Consistency

Nisarg A. Patel

Modern large language models (LLMs) reach 60-70% diagnostic accuracy on complex clinical case benchmarks, but accuracy alone cannot distinguish stable clinically-grounded reasoning from pattern matching. We introduce clinical reasoning graphs, structured graph representations ext…

View free PDFSource page
arxivphysics.soc-phcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

Robust for the Wrong Reasons: The Representational Geometry of LLM Robustness to Science Skepticism

Minjong Cheon

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly consulted on contested scientific questions, raising the concern that they will sycophantically retreat from established consensus when a user signals doubt -- drifting toward a false balance that treats settled science as one view am…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-09

Can We Trust LLM's Logic? Quantifying Uncertainty, Coherence, and Robustness via a Graph-Based Framework

Riccardo Revalor, Jalees Rehman, Debjit Pal

Large-Language Models (LLMs) can be prone to flawed and unfaithful reasoning that decoding strategies like Self-Consistency (SC) fail to detect as they evaluate only final-answer agreement while ignoring the logical validity of intermediate steps. This raises three fundamental qu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-19

Debate-on-Graph: Reliable and Adaptive Reasoning of Large Language Model on Uncertain Knowledge Graph

Peiji Yu, Xin Chen, Tianxing Wu

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. However, LLMs often suffer from hallucinations and lack of relevant knowledge when dealing with question answering (QA) tasks. To mitigate these issues, knowledge graphs (KGs) h…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-07

Danus: Orchestrating Mathematical Reasoning Agents with Fact-Graph Memory

Jihao Liu, Guoxiong Gao, Zeming Sun, Bin Wu, Shurui Liu, Jiedong Jiang, et al.

Recent LLM-based mathematical reasoning agents have begun to tackle research-level problems and, in several cases, have contributed to the resolution of open problems. However, scaling and orchestrating such agents effectively remains challenging, due to the difficulty of coordin…

View free PDFSource page