CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-10

Task-Specific Multimodal Question Answering Agents via Confidence Calibration and Incremental Reasoning for QANTA 2026

Nirjhar Das, Md. Al-Mamun Provath

We present our submission to the QANTA 2026 shared challenge at the ICML 2026 Workshop on Efficient Multimodal Question Answering (EMM-QA). Quanta evaluates multimodal quizbowl systems that answer pyramid-style questions from incrementally revealed text and accompanying images while operating under realistic efficiency constraints. The challenge consists of two distinct tasks: Tossup questions, which require deciding when to answer under uncertainty, and Bonus questions, which emphasize accurate answer selection and human adoption. To address these differing objectives, we develop a task-specific two-agent architecture. Our Tossup agent utilizes a GPT-4o-mini-class model (referred to as GPT-4.1-mini in the competition logs) with confidence-calibrated answering and a domain-specific numeric reasoning policy that reduces overconfident predictions from isolated quantitative clues. Our Bonus agent uses GPT-4o-class model (referred to as GPT-4.1) with leadin-aware reasoning, structured relational reasoning, and multimodal evidence integration to improve exact answer selection. Rather than relying on a retrieval pipeline or model ensembles, our approach emphasizes efficient reasoning policies and confidence calibration within a hosted-only environment. Our system achieved the highest overall leaderboard score of 0.402, including a Tossup score of 0.238 and a Bonus Effect score of 0.164. The results demonstrate that lightweight, task-specific reasoning strategies can provide strong performance on resource-constrained multimodal question answering benchmarks.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CE2026-07-22

Overview of FinMMEval 2026 Task 1: Multilingual Financial Multiple-Choice Question Answering

Zhuohan Xie, Yuyang Dai, Rania Elbadry, Vanshikaa Jani, Georgi Georgiev, Dimitar Dimitrov, et al.

FinMMEval 2026 Task 1 evaluates multilingual financial multiple-choice question answering in English, Chinese, Arabic, and Hindi. The task tests whether systems can select the correct answer to finance questions involving domain terminology, numerical interpretation, and conceptu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CE2026-07-22

Overview of FinMMEval 2026 Task 2: Multilingual Financial Short-Answer Question Answering

Zhuohan Xie, Xueqing Peng, Georgi Georgiev, Dimitar Dimitrov, Yuyang Dai, Rania Elbadry, et al.

FinMMEval 2026 Task 2 evaluates short-answer financial question answering over multilingual evidence. Each final-test item pairs an English question with financial statements and news in English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, and Greek. Participating systems submit one concise answ…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-16

Stop Thinking, Start Looking: Efficient Post-Training for Multimodal Document Question Answering via Reasoning-Free Alignment

Harikrishnan P M, Goutham Vignesh, Ganesh Parab, Saisubramaniam Gopalakrishnan, Vishal Vaddina, Varun V, et al.

Efficient multimodal document question answering with explicit visual grounding, locating the precise document region that supports each answer remains an open challenge. Current approaches bifurcate into Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), which requires large annotated datasets and r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LGcs.MA2026-06-28

Hybrid Retriever Evolution for Multimodal Document Reasoning Agents

Bohan Yao, Shruthan Radhakrishna, Vikas Yadav

Different retrievers, including lexical, semantic, and multimodal approaches, provide highly complementary strengths for multimodal document understanding, yet most systems combine them through fixed pipelines that cannot adapt to the demands of individual reasoning steps. In thi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-10

CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series

Frank Nie, Ethan B. Liu, Yuan Zhu, Loe Yan, Wei Fan, Jindong Han

Clinical time series are central to patient monitoring, risk assessment, and clinical decision support. However, they are often sparse, irregularly sampled, and asynchronous, making it difficult for models to identify the temporal evidence required for clinical Question Answering…

View free PDFSource page