CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SE2026-07-31

Quick Build, Careful Check? Generative AI Use in Hackathons

Wangyiyao Zhou, Alexander Serebrenik, Alexander Nolte

Hackathons are time-bounded events where participants form teams to rapidly build software projects. Their short-term nature makes them a natural setting for Generative AI (GenAI) use, given its promise of speed and efficiency. Yet despite GenAI being increasingly adopted in these events, we still know little about what participants use GenAI for and, crucially, what they do not use it for and why. We report an exploratory interview study with participants from different teams at a two-day AI-themed hackathon in central Europe. We found that participants used GenAI for purposes beyond coding, including learning unfamiliar topics, brainstorming, and preparing documentation. At the same time, they combined multiple GenAI and non-GenAI tools depending on task fit. We also found that, despite the absence of team rules, all participants we studied converged on an unwritten practice of checking GenAI output before using it, yet their ability to actually verify was constrained by time pressure and limited domain knowledge. This work aims to identify avenues for further investigation by outlining a follow-up study combining observation, surveys, and prompt-and-response logs.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-17

Automated Hardware Validation Test Plan Generation for Large Scale AI Datacenter Platforms Using a Generative AI Multi-Agents Architecture

Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Saurabh Kulkarni, Prathamesh Kulkarni, Rohan Kulkarni, Sangwon Yoon, Daehan Won

Large-scale AI datacenter platforms comprise thousands of heterogeneous hardware components whose validation requires comprehensive fault injection test plans. Today these plans are authored manually: engineers review hardware self-healing validation documents and bills of materi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.SE2026-06-29

To Tab or Not to Tab: Measuring Critical Engagement in AI Code Completion Tools Using Behavioral Signals and Attention Checks

Jessica Hutchison, Ian Tyler Applebaum, Kenneth Angelikas, Kush Rakesh Patel, Phuoc Nguyen, Antonio Lazaro, et al.

AI code completion tools, such as Github Copilot, provide students with code suggestions to help them write programs. However, recent qualitative studies suggest that students fail to critically evaluate these suggestions. We present Clover, a code completion tool that logs stude…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.OS2026-07-20

TRIM: Reducing AI-Generated CodeSlop via Agent Trajectory Minimization

Alex Mathai, Shobini Iyer, Aleksandr Nogikh, Petros Maniatis, Franjo Ivancic, Junfeng Yang, et al.

Coding agents are increasingly used to accelerate code generation in many downstream tasks, such as fixing bugs, building applications, and prototyping. However, despite their value as coding assistants, agent-generated code tends to be larger and more verbose than the correspond…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-31

From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale

Chandra Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Smriti Jha, James Saindon, Nachi Nagappan, et al.

AI coding agents are generating code at volumes that exceed the capacity of traditional peer review. At the same time, existing AI code review tools over-index on low-value suggestions such as style and best practices while under-indexing on the concerns human reviewers prioritiz…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.SE2026-07-09

How Analysts Use AI in High-Stakes Crime Linkage: An Industrial Study

Jessica Woodhams, Amy Burrell, Wanyin Li, Fahim Ahmed, Matthew Tonkin, Jan Lemeire, et al.

Crime linkage analysis is used in many countries to identify series of offences that may have been committed by the same individual. In practice, specialist analysts manually search for behavioural and situational connections across large crime databases, an effort that is time-c…

View free PDFSource page