CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-05

Risk-Constrained Freshness-Aware Semantic Caching for Open-Web Retrieval-Augmented LLMs

Muhammad Mansoor, Tahir Ahmad, Yeo-Chan Yoon

Semantic caching reduces the latency and cost of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by serving cached answers to semantically similar queries, but most existing methods do not model the time-varying freshness of open-web evidence. We present FreshCache, a three-tier semantic cache that treats cache reuse as a risk-constrained temporal inference problem: before approving a cache hit, FreshCache estimates the probability that the cached result is stale using a fitted exponential decay model enhanced by a learned MLP, and approves reuse only when that probability falls below a per-tier error budget across answers (epsilon = 0.10), URL lists (epsilon = 0.20), and page content (epsilon = 0.35). This allows the system to degrade gracefully as entries age rather than forcing a binary choice between a stale hit and a full pipeline execution. We introduce FreshCache-Bench, a benchmark of 8,072 base queries across five freshness classes with ground truth staleness labels drawn from real web snapshots at 1, 12, 24 hours, and 7 days after a baseline crawl, expanded to 31,201 queries via paraphrase generation. At the 24-hour evaluation window, FreshCache_MLP achieves 97% search API savings at 0.1% hash-based stale error, and an LLM-judge evaluation on 396 confirmed change pairs shows that only 34.3% of detected content changes actually affect answer correctness, placing true answer-affecting stale error at approximately 0.034%. The rule-based FreshCache achieves 98% search savings at 3.3% stale error under a temporal holdout calibration, outperforming SemanticTTL (14.9% stale, 72% saved), vCache (7.2% stale, 47% saved), and SCALM (5.2% stale, 96% saved). Ablations show the temporal risk gate accounts for an 11.6 point reduction in stale error over similarity-only reuse, and the learned MLP reduces stale error a further 3.2 points over the rule-based model.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

Evaluating Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Academic Texts

Valentin J. J. Kreileder, Johannes Reisinger, Andreas Fischer

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems use the question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to access information outside their parameters. We evaluate if cluster-based semantic chunking improves retrieval and answer quality compared to fixed-size and rec…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-07

Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering

Felix Feldman, Joshua Harris, Timothy Laurence, Leo Loman, Ollie Higgins, Fan Grayson, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising results on medical question answering benchmarks, yet their use in public health is constrained by hallucinations and the rapid evolution of official guidance. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these risks by grounding r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-10

Deceptive Grounding: Entity Attribution Failure in Clinical Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Cedric Caruzzo, Donggeun Yoo, Tae Soo Kim

Retrieval-augmented generation evaluation checks whether model claims are factually grounded in retrieved documents. It does not check whether retrieved evidence is attributed to the correct entity. A clinical RAG response can pass every automated check (zero hallucinations, near…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-05

Detecting Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (GASP)

Mohamed Aly Bouke

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) reduces but does not eliminate hallucination, and existing detectors return a single answer-level score that does not indicate which sentence is unsupported, or why. To close this gap, we introduce Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-26

SHIFT: Gate-Modulated Activation Steering for Knowledge Conflict Mitigation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Ruochang Li, Pengcheng Huang, Zhenghao Liu, Yukun Yan, Huiyuan Xie, Yu Gu, et al.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances LLMs by incorporating external knowledge to support response generation. However, conflicts between retrieved context and parametric knowledge have emerged as a critical challenge in RAG systems. To mitigate such conflicts, numerous s…

View free PDFSource page