CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CY2026-07-03

CAGE-1: Control, Assurance, and Governance Evaluation for Enterprise Agentic AI

Roopam W. Sure

Enterprise artificial intelligence is moving from experimentation into operational workflows. Early programs focused on model access and retrieval-augmented generation, but enterprises are now beginning to deploy agents that plan, retrieve, remember, call tools, update systems, and coordinate work across applications. This changes the evaluation problem. Leaders are no longer asking only whether an answer is accurate or fluent. They need to know who authorized an action, which policy applied, whether evidence was current, whether memory was valid, whether a tool call was permitted, whether the decision can be replayed, and whether the agent can be stopped before it creates business impact. This paper introduces CAGE-1: Control, Assurance, and Governance Evaluation for Enterprise Agentic AI. CAGE-1 is an evaluation framework for deciding whether enterprise agents are ready for deployment. It evaluates authority, policy enforcement, retrieval quality, memory integrity, tool safety, auditability, human oversight, conflict handling, safe failure, Prebind Assurance, operational readiness, and business fitness. CAGE-1 introduces Prebind Assurance to describe the evaluated ability to prove that an agentic action is controlled before it becomes binding, effective, or operationally consequential. The framework tests whether a proposed action is admitted, held, narrowed, refused, escalated, quarantined, or made non-effective before protected consequence forms.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-07

Prompt Coach: An Empirical Evaluation of an Agentic Tutor for Learning Prompt Engineering in Software Development

Rohit Mehra, Kapil Singi, Vikrant Kaulgud, Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Swapnajeet Gon Choudhury, Swati Sharma, et al.

Prompt engineering has emerged as a critical yet undertaught skill for software developers, one that traditional learning approaches are ill-equipped to support given its evolving, interactive, and context-dependent nature. In this paper, we introduce Prompt Coach (PC), an agenti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-07

Agents That Teach: Towards Designing Incidental Learning Back into AI-Assisted Software Development

Rohit Mehra, Samdyuti Suri, Prithviraj K Tagadinamani, Kapil Singi, Vikrant Kaulgud, Adam P. Burden

AI coding agents are rapidly reshaping how software is built, with developers increasingly delegating substantial coding tasks to autonomous agents in pursuit of higher productivity. While these gains are real, they come at the cost of incidental learning. Developers historically…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CYcs.SE2026-07-14

Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning: A Path Toward Eliminating LLM Hallucination in Empirical Inference via Tool-Attested Kernel Proofs

Junyu Ren

Tool access alone does not make LLM empirical reasoning governable: accepted outputs need not descend from attested evidence, and accepted deductions need not hold up under formal scrutiny. We present EG-VAR (Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning), a Lean 4-based tool-call…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CY2026-07-12

Commenting with Copilot: A Taxonomy and Multi-Year Analysis of Student Code-Generation Specifications

Nasser Giacaman, Valerio Terragni, Paul Denny, Viraj Kumar

As AI code tools become integrated into programming environments, students increasingly describe intended behavior in natural language and rely on these tools to generate code, shifting emphasis from code writing to specification. Yet little is known about the comments students w…

View free PDFSource page