CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-07-17

Chronofy: A Temporal-Logical Decay Architecture for Information Validity in Time-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Muntaser Syed, Marius Silaghi, Sheikh Abujar, Sharun Akter

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems retrieve and integrate external knowledge to ground large language model (LLM) outputs. However, current RAG architectures treat all retrieved facts as equally valid regardless of temporal provenance, leading to temporal hallucination, where plausible but obsolete facts corrupt the output. A clinical lab reading from yesterday is actionable; the same reading from six months ago is noise. We present Chronofy, a three-layer neuro-symbolic framework implementing the Temporal-Logical Decay Architecture (TLDA) that embeds temporal validity directly into the representation, retrieval, and reasoning layers of RAG systems. Layer 1 reserves a dedicated temporal subspace within Matryoshka embeddings to make fact age structurally irremovable from the representation. Layer 2 integrates learnable exponential decay functions into graph-based retrieval, where the decay coefficient $β_j$ is grounded in Bayesian decision theory as an approximation of twice the latent process mean-reversion rate. Layer 3 applies Signal Temporal Logic (STL) robustness functions to evaluate the temporal validity of retrieved knowledge, not LLM output confidence, and enforces the possibilistic weakest-link principle to bound output confidence by the most decayed evidence in the reasoning chain. We evaluate Chronofy on temporal knowledge graph forecasting benchmarks, the TimE temporal QA benchmark, and a domain-specific sensitivity analysis, demonstrating that explicit temporal decay modeling improves retrieval precision, reduces temporal hallucination, and enables principled data re-acquisition triggers when temporal context is insufficient.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.LG2026-07-07

Mitigating Errors in LLM-Generated Web API Invocations via Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Constrained Decoding

Daniel Maninger, Leon Chemnitz, Jannis Brugger, Tushar Lamba, Amir Molzam Sharifloo, Mira Mezini

Integration of web APIs is a cornerstone of modern software systems, yet writing correct web API invocation code remains challenging due to complex and evolving API specifications. Although LLMs are increasingly used for code generation, previous work has empirically shown that t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-10

Deceptive Grounding: Entity Attribution Failure in Clinical Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Cedric Caruzzo, Donggeun Yoo, Tae Soo Kim

Retrieval-augmented generation evaluation checks whether model claims are factually grounded in retrieved documents. It does not check whether retrieved evidence is attributed to the correct entity. A clinical RAG response can pass every automated check (zero hallucinations, near…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-17

Do Generative Models Keep Time? A Time-Aware Evaluation of Synthetic Sequential Tabular Data

Kiwan Kwon, Kangmin Kim, Hojin Lee, Yeseong Jung, Hyeongwoo Kong, Vamsi K. Potluru, et al.

Synthetic sequential tabular data are increasingly used for privacy-preserving data sharing, yet a generator can reproduce every marginal and every foreign-key relationship while emitting timestamps that run backwards or repeat, and while sending entities along paths that no real…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-07

Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering

Felix Feldman, Joshua Harris, Timothy Laurence, Leo Loman, Ollie Higgins, Fan Grayson, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising results on medical question answering benchmarks, yet their use in public health is constrained by hallucinations and the rapid evolution of official guidance. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these risks by grounding r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-07-11

EvidentialRAG: Quantifying and Mitigating Information Conflict in Multi-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Evidential Deep Learning

S M Asif Hossain, Ruksat Khan Shayoni, M. F. Mridha

Retrieval-augmented generation grounds large language models in external evidence, but most pipelines still treat retrieved passages as deterministic and mutually consistent context. In open information environments, retrieved sources may disagree because of temporal drift, sourc…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-05

Detecting Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (GASP)

Mohamed Aly Bouke

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) reduces but does not eliminate hallucination, and existing detectors return a single answer-level score that does not indicate which sentence is unsupported, or why. To close this gap, we introduce Grounding-Aware Sensitivity by Perturbation (…

View free PDFSource page