CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-07-11

RDQ: Residual Distribution Quantization for Large Language Models

Prateek Singh

Post-training quantization (PTQ) of large language models degrades sharply below 4-bit precision. We identify the root cause as residual stream distributional drift: quantization noise injected at each transformer layer accumulates in the shared residual representation, causing KL divergence from the FP16 baseline to grow super-linearly with depth (Pearson r=0.999 with log-perplexity, p<0.001, confirmed across all tested methods and bit-widths). We discover that 84% of LLaMA-3-8B layers exhibit non-Gaussian residual distributions (KS test, p<=0.05), and that per-layer residual stream variance grows 6,548x across depth. We propose RDQ (Residual Distribution Quantization), a PTQ framework whose central contribution is Cascaded Error Compensation (CEC): a sequential calibration procedure that captures the actual drifted activations each layer receives (computed by running calibration data through already-quantized upstream layers) and fits per-channel AWQ-style scales against those drifted inputs, with scales folded into preceding RMSNorm weights for exact mathematical equivalence at zero inference overhead. RDQ achieves state-of-the-art results on all three tested architectures: LLaMA-3-8B: 7.55 / 5.62 PPL (W3/W4); Qwen-2.5-7B: 7.46 / 6.38 PPL; Mistral-7B: 6.88 / 5.73 PPL. RDQ beats the best published baseline (LeanQuant/SpinQuant) at every model and bit-width combination, with gains up to -46.4% vs. RTN at W3A16 on LLaMA-3-8B. All output is standard group-128 asymmetric quantization, deployable on Qualcomm AIMET, GGUF, and any standard inference stack at zero runtime overhead.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.SIphysics.soc-ph2026-07-13

Reproducing human biases in route choice using large language models: Toward scalable behavioral modeling

Jiangtao Han, Shoufeng Ma, Shuxian Xu, Geng Li, Shuai Ling, Ning Jia, et al.

Human choice behavior, including route choice, exhibits systematic behavioral biases that deviate from the assumptions of full rationality. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has been widely recognized as an effective framework for characterizing such behavioral patterns. However,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-11

One Token Is Enough: Fingerprinting and Verifying Large Language Models from Single-Token Output Distributions

Tomas Bruckner

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly consumed through opaque serving chains - API aggregators, resellers, and inference providers - in which the client has no technical means to confirm that the model answering is the model advertised, and recent audits show that a subst…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-15

GFlowRL: Scaling Distribution-Matching RL to Large Language Models

Xiaodong Liu, Michael Xu, Jack W. Stokes, Paul Smolensky, Doug Burger, Jianfeng Gao

Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) offer a promising alternative to reward-maximizing reinforcement learning (RL) for large reasoning models, encouraging diverse reasoning paths by matching reward distributions rather than collapsing to dominant modes. Recent work shows promise…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.DC2026-07-14

Agora: Collective and Permissionless Internet-Scale Pretraining of Large Language Models

Gil Avraham, Violetta Shevchenko, Hadi Mohaghegh Dolatabadi, Karol Pajak, James Snewin, Harry Xi, et al.

Training large language models at the multi-billion to trillion parameter scale is confined to datacenters, where data-parallel (DP) and model-parallel (MP) techniques presume homogeneous accelerators, high-speed interconnects, and a single orchestrating entity. Frontier model de…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-10

ConfidenceBench: Evaluating Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models

Matthew ffrench-Constant, Daniel Yang, Xinmeng Huang, Sanyam Kapoor

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings where fluent but incorrect answers can be costly. In these settings, accuracy alone is insufficient: models must also know when they are likely to be wrong. We present ConfidenceBench, a calibration benchmark that…

View free PDFSource page