CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-30

DragonCrawl: A Generative, Intent-Based Framework for Scalable Mobile End-to-End Testing

Sowjanya Puligadda, Mengdie Zhang, Ali Zamani, Dhruva Dixith Kurra, Eric Chen, Juan Marcano

As mobile applications grow in complexity, traditional End-to-End (E2E) testing frameworks struggle with UI volatility, maintenance overhead, and cross-platform scalability. This paper presents DragonCrawl, an AI-driven mobile testing system for continuous regression testing that has evolved from embedding-based similarity matching to generative intent-based reasoning using large language models. Unlike prior LLM-based testing research focused on exploratory testing and crash detection, DragonCrawl validates specific user flows on every code change, blocking commits that break critical functionality. By leveraging GPT-4o's multimodal capabilities, DragonCrawl achieves 91.6% pass rate on iOS and 92.2% on Android across 1,013 automated tests running continuously in CI/CD pipelines. The system reduces test onboarding time from 96-120 hours to under 4 hours and has saved an estimated 27 developer years in test maintenance effort. We present the architectural evolution from V1 (semantic embedding matching) to V2 (generative intent-based reasoning), discuss implementation challenges including token explosion and memory constraints, and report operational experience from production deployment. The integration of multimodal vision for end-state detection and tool calling for backend state transitions enables comprehensive regression testing that bridges UI interactions with system state. Our results demonstrate that AI-driven testing can maintain stability while eliminating the brittleness of traditional automated tests, enabling continuous quality assurance at scale.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-01

TAG: A Lightweight Framework for Test-Driven Agentic Artifact Generation

Yaniv Melamed, Yoni Zukerman, Michal Shechter, Miri Weissler, Ashwin Patil, Hani Neuvirth-Telem

Generating structured artifacts with Large Language Models - e.g.\ database queries, threat framework mappings, entity schemas - is relatively straightforward; however, making them reliable enough for production deployments presents challenges. We present TAG, a lightweight frame…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-24

MineValiCoder: Reliable Code Generation with Test Case Quality Mining and Bipartite Graph-Based Mutual Validation

Zhen Zhao, Qihang Yang, Feifei Dai, Xiangfang Li, Bo Li

Large Language Model (LLM)-based Test-Driven Development (TDD) has advanced automated code generation. However, existing approaches depend heavily on human-crafted test cases and cannot operate effectively when only natural-language requirements are available. Although recent wor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-06-29

SpreadsheetBench 2: Evaluating Agents on End-to-End Business Spreadsheet Workflows

Jian Zhu, Yuzheng Zhang, Zeyao Ma, Bohan Zhang, Armin Schoepf, Daniel Woloch, et al.

Spreadsheets are widely used for business analysis, financial modeling, reporting, and decision-making. However, most existing spreadsheet benchmarks evaluate isolated operations such as single-formula generation or local cell edits, and therefore fail to capture end-to-end workf…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-22

Beyond Fail-to-Pass: Iterative Hardening of Co-Generated Bug Reproduction Tests and Fixes

Yuhao Tan, Zhibang Yang, Fangkai Yang, Yuan Yao, Yu Kang, Lu Wang, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) have made automated program repair (APR) increasingly practical for real-world bugs, but repairing directly from bug reports remains underconstrained. Bug reproduction tests (BRTs) help close this gap by turning a bug report into an executable, bug-sp…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-23

From Resource Flow to Executable Tests: Petri-Net-Guided LLM Test Generation for Concurrent Stateful Rust APIs

Kaiwen Zhang, Guanjun Liu

Concurrent stateful library APIs expose behavior through evolving resource ownership, lifecycle states, and competing interleavings. Large language models can synthesize executable Rust tests, but their outputs often violate API preconditions, remain shallow, or reduce concurrenc…

View free PDFSource page