CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LGecon.GN2026-06-29

Field Order Should Not Matter: Permutation-Invariant Embedding Model Fine-Tuning for Structured Metadata Retrieval

Aivin V. Solatorio, Olivier Dupriez, Rafael Macalaba

We study retrieval over catalogs of structured metadata, where each record is a small schema whose fields answer different kinds of query. Embedding a record with a text encoder first serializes its fields into a string, which forces a choice of field order. We show this choice, usually treated as an implementation detail, silently controls retrieval quality once the encoder is fine-tuned. A standard fine-tune loses 7.4 nDCG@10 points when the index is rebuilt under a different field order, because it reads absolute position instead of the field labels. We propose permutation-invariant fine-tuning ($\textbf{PI-FT}$), which serializes each record under a freshly sampled field order with random field dropout, so meaning binds to the labels rather than to position. The change is about two lines in the data loader; it costs negligible in-distribution accuracy and cuts the order-change penalty to 0.2 points. We study this in the discovery of development statistics, a catalog of nearly 10,000 indicators that should be searchable in many languages by a model small enough to self-host. As AI assistants and agents increasingly mediate access to public data and statistics, this retrieval step decides whether an answer is grounded in the right indicator or series, making discoverability a precondition for disseminating data through AI. Because usage logs cannot provide training signal for indicators no one has searched, we generate the queries instead. $\textbf{DevDataBench}$ is a fully LLM-generated benchmark of grounded, facet-targeted queries across 15 languages, covering every indicator for both training and evaluation. A fine-tuned 118M-parameter CPU encoder outperforms every zero-shot baseline, including $\texttt{text-embedding-3-large}$ (0.707 vs.\ 0.556 nDCG@10), with the largest gains in low-resource languages. We release the benchmark, pipeline, models, and a reusable PI-FT framework.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-06-29

ARMOR: Adaptive Retriever Optimization for Low-Resource Telecom Question Answering

Heshan Fernando, Quan Xiao, Yan Xin, Tianyi Chen

Telecom question answering (QA) is a challenging setting for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): evidence is fragmented across standards, papers, encyclopedic resources, and web documents, and answers often hinge on technical tables, equations, and specialized protocol language…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-06-29

SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

Nikolay Georgiev, Maria Drencheva, Kseniia Ibragimova, Ivo Petrov, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin Vechev

As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.DLcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-10

Automatic Thematic Indexing of Large Literary Corpora: A Machine Learning Approach to Voltaire's Complete Works

Miguel Arana-Catania, Gillian Pink, Glenn Roe

Thematic indexing -- the practice of assigning structured conceptual labels to sections of text -- is essential to scholarly access in large-scale literary and historical editions, yet it remains a largely manual, labour-intensive process. This paper explores the application of m…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.DLcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-10

Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI

Miguel Arana-Catania, Catherine Conisbee, Matthew Kidd

Identifying and assigning keywords at scale is a technical, practical, and ethical challenge for crowdsourced collections. This article reports the findings of the "Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections" project, which used the Their Finest Hour Online Archive, a crow…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LG2026-06-27

The strength of clinical evidence is recoverable from language model representations but not from their stated grades

Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly summarize clinical evidence, where a claim's weight depends on how strongly it is supported. Yet these models convey confidence poorly, and properties they never state, such as truth, are often readable from their activations. Whether a c…

View free PDFSource page