CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-07-13

An Agentic AI Scientific Community for Automated Neural Operator Discovery

Luis Loo, Ulisses Braga-Neto

We present an agentic approach to autonomous neural operator discovery based on an AI scientific community, which consists of a swarm of virtual laboratories that interact under a citation-based economy of influence. Highly-cited labs found new labs that follow their research direction and replace non-performing labs. Each virtual lab contains three agents: an LLM planner that proposes an architecture, a numerical worker that trains and measures it, and an LLM reviewer that participates in cross-lab peer review. All labs share a common vocabulary consisting of DeepONet (branch-trunk), Fourier, Transformer (attention), wavelet, and residual convolutional neural operator building blocks. We evaluate the neural operator AI scientific community on five problems, namely piecewise regression, the linear advection and Burgers 1D PDEs, and the Navier-Stokes and Darcy flow 2D PDEs, while repeating the simulation three times for each problem. The results show that the neural operator AI scientific community is capable of discovering high-accuracy, low-parameter-count neural operator architectures. All 9,623 LLM calls are logged and audited, which reveals that the virtual lab LLM planners choose to hybridize in 99.8% of their logged decisions, consistently returning multi-family hybrids. Moreover, we conducted an ablation study by replacing the LLM agents in each lab by rule-based alternatives, which caused the scientific community to collapse to non-hybridized single-family stacks in several cases, showing that LLM agency is needed to preserve diversity. The results suggest a no-free-lunch theorem for neural operators: there is no universal winner. The code, configurations, and the complete LLM transcripts are released at https://github.com/luislootx/AI-SC.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-08

Physics-Audited Agentic Discovery in Scientific Machine Learning

Diab W. Abueidda, Bilal Ahmed, Panos Pantidis, Mostafa E. Mobasher

In agentic scientific machine learning (SciML), large language model (LLM) agents can discover surrogate models and select one by an automated score, typically an error metric. A low error, however, does not establish that the predicted fields satisfy the physics that matter for…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.CYcs.LGcs.SI2026-06-29

Using AI Agents to Automate Black-Box Audits of Personalization Algorithms at Scale

Alessandro Morosini, Sarah H. Cen, Andrew Ilyas, Hedi Driss, Aleksander Mądry, Chara Podimata

Personalization algorithms determine what content users encounter on online platforms. Auditing these systems is difficult because independent auditors have only black-box access to the algorithms, while personalization depends on users' attributes, behavior, and evolving interac…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-21

ResearchArena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in Automated AI R&D

Lena Libon, Ben Rank, Jehyeok Yeon, David Schmotz, Jeremy Qin, Daniel Donnelly, et al.

As AI agents begin to automate AI R&D, we need ways to assess whether their outputs are safe to deploy, even when the agents themselves may be untrusted. AI control offers one such approach: rather than trusting the agent, it treats it as a potential adversary and uses a monitor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-06

PDEFlow: Autonomous Agentic PDE Pipelines for Neural Operator Learning and Solver-Free Inference

Akshat Jani, Prathamesh Gadekar, Sakhinana Sagar Srinivas, Venkataramana Runkana

We present PDEFlow, an autonomous agentic framework that turns user-level ODE and PDE descriptions into solver-backed neural-operator pipelines. The workflow links problem specification, data generation, operator training, and checkpoint-based inference. A stateful input graph co…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SYcs.LG2026-06-29

A Systematic Approach to Multi-Agent AI from Advanced Regulatory Control Theory: Safe and Auditable LLM Operator Agents for Process Control

Idelfonso B. R. Nogueira, Sigurd Skogestad

Recent literature shows that large language models (LLMs) are useful for general-purpose tasks yet perform poorly on specific domain ones. One reason is the difficulty of supplying narrow context to a general-purpose model and of bounding the task it is asked to perform. It is po…

View free PDFSource page