CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.DCcs.MA2026-07-02

LLMoxie: Exploring Agentic AI for Scientific Software Development

Landung Setiawan, Anant Mittal, Cordero Core, Anshul Tambay, Carlos Garcia Jurado Suarez, David A. C. Beck, Andrew J. Connolly, Vani Mandava

In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for AI coding agents. Layered on top, an open-source RSE-Plugins ecosystem encodes accumulated RSE knowledge as a Plugin-Agent-Skill hierarchy spanning scientific Python practice, domain-specific knowledge, a six-phase research-and-implement workflow, and project lifecycle management. Scientific software is judged less by raw code quality than by whether it can be cited, audited, reproduced, and extended. Off-the-shelf AI coding agents, optimized against commercial software benchmarks, are poorly calibrated for this setting: they ignore the conventions of the scientific Python libraries they invoke, mishandle sensitive or embargoed data, and leave decision trails that are difficult to reconstruct after the fact. We report on twenty months of practice at a university-based research software engineering (RSE) center, where RSEs embedded across astronomy, earth and climate science, agriculture, and health projects worked to close this gap. We characterize the recurring infrastructure, governance, and process challenges of adopting Agentic AI inside a multi-domain RSE center, describe the platform and plugin design, and distill operational lessons from real scientific software deployments. Together, the platform and plugins shift AI coding agents from generic code generators into domain-aware collaborators that respect community norms and produce auditable provenance of technical reasoning.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.DCcs.ETcs.MA2026-07-08

Progressive Crystallization: Turning Agent Exploration into Deterministic, Lower-Cost Workflows in Production

Arun Malik

AI agents deployed for IT operations are typically permanent cost centers because every execution requires full LLM inference, even for previously solved problems. This paper introduces progressive crystallization, a lifecycle that treats agent exploration as a discovery mechanis…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-17

Automated Hardware Validation Test Plan Generation for Large Scale AI Datacenter Platforms Using a Generative AI Multi-Agents Architecture

Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Saurabh Kulkarni, Prathamesh Kulkarni, Rohan Kulkarni, Sangwon Yoon, Daehan Won

Large-scale AI datacenter platforms comprise thousands of heterogeneous hardware components whose validation requires comprehensive fault injection test plans. Today these plans are authored manually: engineers review hardware self-healing validation documents and bills of materi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-06

An Exploration of Agentic Information Fusion for Test Maintenance Prediction

Jingxiong Liu, Nasser Mohammadiha, Gregory Gay

Test maintenance is a critical, yet costly, activity - particularly as codebases rapidly evolve. To assist, we present MAST, a multi-agent framework that predicts which test cases require maintenance following changes to the production code. This identification task is necessary…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.DCcs.MAcs.NI2026-07-13

PFAdapter: Hierarchical LoRA Decomposition for Personalized Federated MLLMs

Jing Liu, Kun Yang, Yan Wang, Dingkang Yang, Xiaoshuai Hao, Wei Zhang, et al.

Agentic AI systems are reshaping communications and networking by deploying autonomous intelligent agents capable of collaborative learning while maintaining data privacy at network edges. Within distributed network environments, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) serve as…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-19

Auto Research for Materials: Auditable AI-Scientist Workflows with Held-Out Transfer

Jingjie Ning, Xiaochuan Li, Shanshan Zhong, Ji Zeng, Guolin Ke

An AI research agent can improve the score it sees without finding a modelling change that works on new materials. We ask a stricter question. After repeated experiments, does the selected change survive on data that never entered the loop, and can its code be reused? We separate…

View free PDFSource page