CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.FLcs.AIcs.CLcs.LO2026-06-29

Destination-Labeled Self-Looping Systems with Dwell: Intrinsic Characterization, Realization Cost, and Recognition

Reda Belaiche

We study a finite-state symbolic controller for systems in which the admissible visible transitions are fixed in advance and each visible state carries a minimum dwell requirement. The resulting model, which we call a destination-labeled self-looping system with dwell (DLSL system), records the visible graph together with local decision maps; dwell memory appears only after phase expansion. The main structural issue is that, once dwell is imposed, the current visible state no longer determines whether a departure is allowed. This leads to the converse problem: which deterministic transducers arise as phase-expanded realizations of DLSL systems over a fixed visible graph? We show that the answer is exactly the class of fiber-linear graph-respecting transducers. Under natural reachability and realizable-departure assumptions, equivalent accessible realizations over the same visible graph are isomorphic; in particular, the visible transduction determines the dwell vector and the local decision maps. We also prove that any graph-preserving deterministic realization enforcing dwell values $(d_i)$ requires exactly $\sum_i d_i$ control states. Finally, we give an $O(|Q||Ω|)$ recognition and reconstruction procedure, and extend the analysis to an edge-entry variant in which transitions may enter interior phases of successor fibers.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LOcs.AIcs.CCcs.CL2026-06-26

The Unverifiability of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Alignment, Static and Dynamic: From Trakhtenbrot's Wall to the Safety-Generality Tension

Jose Pascual Gumbau Mezquita

We establish the mathematical limits of AGI safety in two forms: verifying a fixed system, and verifying that a certified safety property persists once the system self-modifies. In the static case, no algorithm can certify a highly expressive AGI's safe behaviour infallibly, comp…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LO2026-06-30

Beyond Compilation: Evaluating Faithful Natural-Language-to-Lean Statement Formalization

Ke Zhang, Patricio Gallardo Candela, Sudhir Murthy, Yi Xie, Zhi Wang, Maziar Raissi

Theorem-proving benchmarks evaluate proof search against fixed formal statements, but natural-language-to-Lean formalization must generate the formal statement itself. In this setting, compilation is only a validity check: a Lean declaration may type-check while omitting hypothes…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LO2026-07-11

Interventional Grounding Audits: Black-Box Premise-Dependency Tests for LLM Chain-of-Thought via Predicate Substitution

Hironao Nakamura

Large language models produce chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning that appears logically sound yet may not genuinely depend on its stated premises. We introduce interventional grounding audits, a black-box, step-level test of premise dependency: we intervene on a single premise by s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LOcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

ADVENT: LLM-Driven Automatic Predicate Invention for ILP

Tingting Yu, Pei-Cing Huang, Chan Hsu, Chan-Tung Ku, Yihuang Kang

Predicate invention (PI), the creation of new predicates to extend the hypothesis space, remains a critical bottleneck in Inductive Logic Programming (ILP). Existing methods rely on domain expertise and produce semantically opaque predicates, hindering adaptation to unfamiliar do…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.LOcs.SE2026-07-01

Theoria: Rewrite-Acceptability Verification over Informal Reasoning States

Michael Saldivar, Ben Slivinski

When should an AI system's answer be trusted? Formal proof assistants offer certainty but cannot reach most of the problem distribution; scalar LLM judges offer coverage but produce opaque scores that cannot be audited after the fact and are subject to the same coherence issues a…

View free PDFSource page