CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CG2026-06-28

Invariant Reasoning Directions in Latent Trajectories of Language Models

Arun Vignesh Malarkkan, Manan Roy Choudhury, Utkarsh Byahut, Yash Ravindra Charde, Vivek Gupta, Yanjie Fu

Latent reasoning models perform multi-step inference directly in hidden-state space, yet the structure of these latent reasoning trajectories remains poorly understood. We show that contrastive refinement signals between stronger and weaker reasoning trajectories exhibit a highly concentrated low-rank structure, while unconstrained latent updates remain sensitive to paraphrases, checkpoint choice, and trajectory perturbations. These observations suggest that latent reasoning trajectories contain stable invariant directions mixed with unstable instance-specific variation. We introduce \textbf{Trajectory-Invariant Latent Refinement (TILR)}, a training-free intervention framework for identifying and manipulating stable reasoning directions in latent space. TILR first learns a low-rank invariant subspace from contrastive trajectory differences across inputs, then constrains latent interventions to this subspace while suppressing poorly aligned updates through an adaptive alignment gate. Across six reasoning benchmarks, we find that a small number of latent directions explain most variation between strong and weak reasoning trajectories. Interventions on these directions causally improve reasoning consistency and reduce trajectory instability under paraphrases and perturbations. TILR improves answer consistency under paraphrase by ~10% and reduces latent trajectory variance by up to $50\%$ while preserving reasoning accuracy. These results support a geometric view of latent reasoning in which transferable reasoning behavior emerges from stable low-dimensional structure within hidden-state trajectories.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CG2026-06-29

Informational Frustration in Neural Manifolds: Shannon Bottlenecks and the Limits of Learnability

Srinivasa Rao P., Vangmayi P Reddy

Why overparameterised deep networks generalise so remarkably well remains one of the most stubborn open questions in machine learning theory. Classical frameworks like VC dimension and Rademacher complexity predict catastrophic overfitting in modern models, leaving a massive theo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-14

Enhancing Small Language Models Reasoning through Knowledge Graph Grounding

Dimitrios Kelesis, Konstantinos Bougiatiotis, Georgios Paliouras

Although large language models (LLMs) have set benchmarks for zero-shot reasoning, their deployment remains cost-prohibitive and environmentally taxing. Small Language Models (SLMs) offer a sustainable alternative, but prone to errors, on tasks requiring complex, multi-hop logica…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-21

LatentMT: Machine Translation with Latent Reasoning

Wei-Rui Chen, Samar M. Magdy, Chiyu Zhang, Wenhui Zhu, Zhipeng Wang, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed

Latent-reasoning looped language models (LoopLMs) offer a different scaling path for machine translation (MT): instead of increasing parameter count or emitting explicit chain-of-thought tokens, they spend additional recurrent computation inside hidden states. We introduce Latent…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.MM2026-06-28

ScAle: Attention Head Scaling as a Minimal Adapter for Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models

Rahul Chowdhury, Timothy A Rupprecht, Xuan Shen, Pu Zhao, Yanzhi Wang

Spatial reasoning remains a persistent challenge for many vision language models (VLMs), and improving it typically requires fine-tuning with substantial additional parameters. Our preliminary analysis reveals that rescaling activations in selected transformer layers-without modi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-08

Efficient Safety Alignment of Language Models via Latent Personality Traits

Mohamed Amine Merzouk, Nolan Smyth, Damiano Fornasiere, Linh Le, David Williams-King, Adam Oberman

Current safety methods for large language models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, motivating research into robust alternatives. Latent Adversarial Training (LAT) is among the most effective defenses, but can degrade utility and requires training on large dataset…

View free PDFSource page