CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivstat.MLcs.LGphysics.comp-ph2026-06-27

A Bayesian latent Gaussian process framework for aerodynamic uncertainty quantification

Geoffrey Davis, Ashwin Renganathan

Predicting the aerodynamic performance (e.g. lift, drag, and moment coefficients) of an aircraft is challenging -- computational models are biased and direct simulations are prohibitive. A pragmatic way to overcome this limitation is by calibrating low-fidelity computational predictions with experimental measurements. This, however, requires calibrating against \emph{sparse} measurements contaminated with \emph{uncertainty} in both the control inputs and the measured aerodynamic response. We develop a methodology to address this problem based on Gaussian process surrogates and the classical Kennedy-O'Hagan calibration. A surrogate model learned on abundant-but-cheap low-fidelity data is calibrated with a sparse set of measurement data. Crucialy, we develop a Bayesian latent Gaussian process based approach that marginalizes the calibrated surrogate model over the input uncertainty, while also matching the marginal mean and variance of the measured output uncertainty. Once calibrated, our surrogate model predicts the uncertainty in aerodynamic coefficients with very high accuracy, including at extrapolative input settings. We validate our calibrated surrogate model predictions against measurement data with \emph{true} uncertainty intervals to demonstrate that the model places $94.2-95.8\%$ of its predictive samples inside the released $95\%$ truth intervals, with endpoint cumulative probabilities very close to the nominal 0.025 and 0.975 levels.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MLcs.LGmath.PRstat.APstat.COstat.ME2026-07-21

A Bayesian Framework for Built-in Input Dimension Reduction for Gaussian Process Modeling

Eric Herrison Gyamfi, Emily L. Kang, Bledar A. Konomi, Guang Lin

Gaussian process (GP) modeling is widely used in computational science and engineering. However, fitting a GP to high-dimensional inputs remains challenging due to the curse of dimensionality. While various methods have been proposed to reduce input dimensionality, they typically…

View free PDFSource page
arxivphysics.comp-phphysics.data-anstat.MEstat.ML2026-07-21

Uncertainty quantification in mechanics: A unified Bayesian perspective

Sascha Ranftl, Malte Rolf, Gerhard A. Holzapfel, Ellen Kuhl

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential to experimental mechanics, but has become particularly relevant in computational mechanics, manifesting in two fundamental problem types: forward and inverse problems. The former addresses how input uncertainties propagate to the quant…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-16

Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification

Raghad Alamri, Michele Caprio, Gavin Brown

We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification. Uncertainty measures are not primitives, in need of axioms and argumentation, but instead consequences, of higher-level modelling decisions. We show how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via de…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.LGstat.COstat.ME2026-06-30

Dynamic Gaussian Processes and the Vanilla-SPDE Exchange

Rui-Yang Zhang, Lachlan Astfalck, Edward Cripps, David Leslie, Henry Moss

Gaussian process inference is often limited by cubic computational costs, a challenge that becomes more pronounced in spatio-temporal settings where posterior inference is required over dense grids. While state-space SPDE formulations enable linear complexity in time, exact infer…

View free PDFSource page