CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-31

Explaining AI-Image Detection: What the Heatmap Actually Shows

Leonid Kuturin, Ilya Sotnikov, Mark Khusnutdinov, Mikhail Potemkin, Pavel Baranas, Aleksandra Korepanova, Alexander Kalashnikov

A marketplace review photograph is a document: platforms approve refunds on it, and generative models drove the cost of forging one to zero. We study that detection problem, so we build a detector and attach an attribution map as its evidence, then measure what that pair delivers on 186,527 images under controls designed to change our conclusions when something is wrong. Compression history, not synthesis, drives naive evaluation: our strongest model reaches 0.9999 PR-AUC (area under the precision-recall curve) on a product-disjoint split, yet falls to 0.7254 once we re-encode synthetics into the real class's format, while five public detectors move by at most 0.07. Aligning one class relocates the cue rather than removing it, and the repaired model then assigns native files a median probability of synthesis of 0.0004. One identical final encode for both classes repairs that, and a three-seed factorial credits the encoding change with the whole gain (+0.176 +- 0.009 PR-AUC). That encode equalises the last stage only: forensic features alone still separate the classes at 0.7145 against a base rate of 0.254. For evidence we test maps causally, against controls that never consult the detector. Whether an attribution ranking exists at all depends on whether the detector reacts to the image. On our first-fix detector, which calls 96 of 100 edited frames real, no map beats a random one. On the detector we selected, twelve of seventeen maps clear that control on edited images and eight on generated ones; perturbation leads both axes and no gradient-CAM variant shows a positive advantage. The trivial controls never clear it, and on generated images the centre prior is worse than random. Our ensembled regional map clears both axes and takes the top pixel AP at 12.4 s per map against 44.9 for occlusion. Clearing a detector-blind control is not yet a faithful explanation, and we demonstrate none.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CV2026-06-30

Fleet: Few Shots Lead Effective AI-generated Image Detection

Jiaan Wang, Sirui Liu, Yu Li, Kaiyuan Yang, Juan Cao, Sheng Tang

AI-generated image (AIGI) detection is undergoing a critical transition from laboratory benchmarks to open-world adversarial defense. The prevalent paradigm focuses on finding static feature spaces, assuming that some invariant artifacts learned from historical data can achieve u…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-04

Ghosts Beneath Textures: Texture-Relation Cues for Cross-Paradigm AI-Generated Image Detection

Haoyu Wang, Yiming Qin, Zhongjie Ba, Ziping Dong, Jishen Zeng, Peng Cheng, et al.

AI-generated images have proliferated rapidly, motivating extensive research. Most existing AI-generated image detectors are developed and evaluated under image-free generation paradigms, such as noise-based or text-guided generation. However, image-conditioned generation has bec…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-16

GlobalForge: Towards Robust AI-Generated Image Detection

Manni Cui, Ruiqi Liu, Dianyuan Zou, Ziheng Qin, Jingrui Xu, ZiAn Wang, et al.

AI-generated image (AIGI) detectors achieve strong accuracy on clean benchmarks, but their performance drops sharply after images are propagated through real-world channels. We trace this fragility to what these detectors actually learn: they overfit to local artifacts left by ge…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-09

Do Transformations Reveal the Truth? Generative Residual Learning for Generalized AI-Generated Image Detection

Kutub Uddin, Nusrat Tasnim, Awais Khan, Mohammad Umar Farooq, Khalid Malik

The rapid advancement of generative AI has enabled the creation of highly realistic deepfake media, posing significant threats, including misinformation, digital identity theft, fraud, and manipulation of public opinion. AI-generated image (AIGI) detection is reliably challenging…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-24

FAIR: Feature-Augmented Implicit Regularization for AI-generated Fake Image Detection

Md Redwanul Haque, Manzur Murshed, Manoranjan Paul, Tsz-Kwan Lee

Generalization remains a critical bottleneck in AI-generated image detection. Because many modern generators are proprietary or adversarially modified, existing detectors overfit to the low-level textural patterns of accessible training data, resulting in severe failures on unsee…

View free PDFSource page