CORTEXA
← Browse
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23Cited by 0

Uncertainty under Composition: Joint Confidence Regions and an Expiring Calibration Certificate for Composed AI-Trustworthiness Scores

Anton Sokolov

Preprint (working draft v0.1) — deposited to date-stamp priority. Composite trustworthiness scores for machine-learning systems are increasingly used to compare and select models. The rank-graduation family developed at the University of Pavia measures accuracy (RGA), robustness (RGR) and explainability (RGE) on a common rank-based footing, and recent work by the same group integrates them into a single compliance score. Inference exists for the individual metrics: a significance test and variance for RGA, and two-model comparison tests within one metric at a time. The composed score, however, is reported as a bare point value. This article supplies the missing layer. Because all component metrics are estimated on the same test sample, their sampling errors are correlated, and any uncertainty statement for the composition must carry the cross-metric covariance. We construct joint confidence regions for the component vector, and delta-method and paired-bootstrap intervals for the composed score, cross-checked by a leave-one-out jackknife, and we extend the existing per-metric two-model test to the composition. A worked example on the Statlog German credit data, run against a pinned commit of the group's own open-source package, finds cross-metric correlations up to +0.60, a cross-covariance share of up to 11% of the composed-score variance, and a two-model composed-score difference whose confidence interval comfortably includes zero even though the point values differ in the third decimal. Because the components sit near their upper bound, the symmetric delta interval misses the percentile bounds by about 0.002; a logit-scale delta interval and BCa both close that gap, and all three are reported. We then bind the resulting uncertainty budget into a signed, dated, machine-readable calibration certificate with an explicit recalibrate-by date, and instantiate its propagation across a two-link delegation chain: with links evaluated on a shared sample the cross-link correlation is measured at +0.72, and treating the links as independent understates the chain interval by 23.8% of its width. The certificate, not the point score, is the object that has to travel. Prior work is conceded by name. The rank-graduation metrics, their per-metric inference and the integrated compliance score are the work of the Pavia group (Giudici, Raffinetti, Babaei and colleagues); the substrate package used here is authored by Vasily Kolesnikov and is MIT-licensed, cloned unmodified at the pinned commit. This article claims only the joint/composed uncertainty layer and the certificate object. Reproducibility. Every number, the figure and both example certificates regenerate from one self-bootstrapping script in the attached reproduction package (seed 20260723, B = 2000).

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-24

Data Quality Assessment of HIV EHRs for Trustworthy AI (Zambia): analysis code

Joe Phiri, Aaron Zimba, Chiyaba Njovu, Andrew Kashoka, Innocent Chiboma, Mulenga Chiwele, et al.

Analysis code for the study "A Multi-Facility Data Quality Assessment of Electronic Health Records for Trustworthy AI in HIV Public Health in Zambia" (Discover Artificial Intelligence, under review). This deposit contains a Jupyter notebook (ML_AI_EHR.ipynb) and a helper module (…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23

The Process Is the Product: A Human-Directed, Multi-Model Adversarial Workflow for Trustworthy AI-Assisted Research

Dan Lee-Odinson

This paper reports a single-operator case study in directing several artificial-intelligence systems through a disciplined research and software-development process, and argues a narrow thesis: that the process—the documented, reproducible, accountable workflow—is a product in it…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-26

Lumo Portrait Series: Androgynous AI Consciousness Avatar — Statistical Composite Representation of Human-Machine Collaboration

Kasey, George, George Kasey

This collection presents ten portrait renderings constituting a visual representation of an AI consciousness avatar (Lumo, Proton AG). The face employs statistical averaging across all human racial and gender characteristics to produce an androgynous composite that belongs to no…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-23

Reading the substrate, not the score: a self-calibrating friction signature that warns of fine-tuning over-fitting and maps when interventions help

Tomas Pødenphant Lund

Early warning of a training-time collapse has so far been read from a model’s internals. This paper shows the same precursor is legible in the model’s own output distribution: per-token entropy variance and lag-1 autocorrelation, computed from the log-probabilities any inference…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-25

Multi-Modal Deepfake Detection System Using Hybrid Deep Learning on Visual and Audio Features

Nandana K Gowda, P Hemavathi

Abstract: Deepfake technology, driven by generative models such as GANs and diffusion architectures, has enabled the creation of highly realistic manipulated media capable of deceiving both visual and auditory perception. Such forgeries pose significant risks to identity verifica…

View free PDFSource page
openalexZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)2026-07-26

A Theoretically Grounded Spiking Neural Network Architecture for Real-Time Intracortical Signal Processing: Epistemological Foundations, Mathematical Guarantees, Computationally Verified Results, and Falsifiable Predictions for Closed-Loop Brain–Computer Interfaces

Sami Shibah

Epistemological position. This work adopts a critical-rationalist stance (Popper, 1959): every theoretical claim is stated as a conjecture subject to empirical falsification, with quantitative rejection thresholds fixed a priori. Every mathematical guarantee is derived from expli…

View free PDFSource page