CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIstat.ML2026-06-29

Accelerometry-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Risk: A Population-Representative Tabular Benchmark with Uncertainty Quantification

Federico Felizzi

Structured tabular data dominates clinical medicine, yet existing benchmarks fail to reflect real-world properties like complex survey sampling, demographic oversampling, and subgroup fairness. We introduce the NHANES Accelerometry Cardiometabolic Benchmark, derived from NHANES 2003-2006, comprising 1,381 adults with hip-worn accelerometry, fasting laboratory biomarkers, dietary intake, and anthropometrics. We evaluate three tabular learning methods -- ridge regression, XGBoost, and the foundation model TabPFN v2 -- to predict glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting triglycerides, and C-reactive protein (CRP) from activity phenotypes and lifestyle covariates. TabPFN v2 achieves the best overall performance (HbA1c R^2=0.156, CRP R^2=0.383), while triglycerides remain largely unpredictable (R^2 < 0.05), consistent with known genetic dominance. We apply split conformal prediction to generate distribution-free 90% prediction intervals and evaluate demographic coverage equity across sex and race/ethnicity subgroups. Marginal coverage aligns with the 90% target for CRP and HbA1c but falls below for triglycerides. At the subgroup level, we observe localized undercoverage (e.g., HbA1c for Mexican American participants), illustrating the gap between marginal guarantees and the conditional coverage required for clinical fairness. Code and data are at https://github.com/felizzi/nhanes-accel-cardiometabolic-benchmark.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-16

Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification

Raghad Alamri, Michele Caprio, Gavin Brown

We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification. Uncertainty measures are not primitives, in need of axioms and argumentation, but instead consequences, of higher-level modelling decisions. We show how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via de…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIstat.ML2026-06-25

Decision-Aligned Evaluation of Uncertainty Quantification

Annika Schneider, Tommy Rochussen, Joshua Stiller, Vincent Fortuin

Uncertainty estimates in machine learning are typically evaluated using generic metrics such as the negative log-likelihood and expected calibration error, yet good performance on such metrics does not necessarily imply high utility in downstream decisions. We introduce decision-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIstat.ML2026-07-10

CLOE: Christoffel Loss Autoencoder for Anomaly Detection

Léa Billet, Louise Travé-Massuyès, Elodie Chanthery, Alexandre Gaffet

Semi-supervised anomaly detection plays a key role in diverse fields such as process monitoring, healthcare, and finance. However, lightweight methods often struggle with high-dimensional data and typically require careful tuning of multiple hyperparameters. Among existing approa…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CVcs.ITstat.ML2026-07-03

CuBAS: Information Geometric Curvature-Based Adaptive Sampling for Supervised Classification

Alexandre L. M. Levada

The informativeness of a training set is as consequential as its size, yet most sampling strategies remain agnostic to the intrinsic geometry of the data distribution. We introduce CuBAS (Curvature-Based Adaptive Sampling), an information-geometric framework for adaptive data sel…

View free PDFSource page