CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-06-26Cited by 0

Typing Behavior in Human-LLM Interaction: Keystroke Dynamics Reveal Cognitive Effort During Prompting

Laura Schütz, Yousri Cherif, Clara Sayffaerth, Thomas Weber, Francesco Chiossi

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into daily routines, understanding how users interact with these systems is crucial for effective human-AI collaboration. This work investigates keystroke dynamics as a behavioral measure of user mental effort and perceived output usefulness in human-LLM interaction. We conducted a user study (N = 36) to examine how task difficulty (easy vs. hard) and device type (desktop vs. mobile) influence typing behavior and workload (NASA-TLX) during interactions. Our results indicate that hard tasks led to significantly more keystrokes, slower typing, increased pauses, and higher self-reported workload. Device type had weaker effects, with mobile use slightly reducing input length and typing speed. While keystrokes captured differences in cognitive effort, they did not predict perceived LLM output usefulness. These findings highlight the potential of keystroke dynamics as real-time indicators of cognitive effort during LLM prompting, while also showing their limitations in capturing perceived collaboration success.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-08

Learning social norms enhances compatibility in dynamic human-AI coordination

Yi Yang, Siyuan Liu, Xin Gao, Huamu Sun, Chao Liu, Qing Zhou, et al.

Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard-to-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents. As AI agents, including large language models (LLMs), become embedded in daily life, they incr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-08

Two-player Alternate Uses Test: A Controlled Testbed for Interactive Human-AI and Human-Human Co-Creation

Babak Hemmatian, Anita Keshmirian, Yijun Lin, Shravan Ramamoorthy, Maryam Jahadakbar, Eli Khuri-Reid, et al.

Controlled research on AI ideation typically compares independent agents, while field studies of human-AI collaboration sacrifice experimental control. We introduce a controlled, two-player extension of the Alternate Uses Test (AUT) that enables comparison of human-human and huma…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.HC2026-06-27

When Stopping Fails: Rethinking Minimal Risk Conditions through Human-Interactive Autonomous Driving for Safe Transportation Systems

Yash Tandon, Giovanni Tapia Lopez, Marcus Blennemann, Mohan Trivedi, Ross Greer

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are increasingly deployed in urban environments, yet their safety frameworks remain primarily designed around collision avoidance and minimal risk condition (MRC) behaviors such as slowing or stopping when uncertainty arises. Although effective in reduci…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.HC2026-07-13

ERR@HRI 3.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Anticipation in Human-Robot Interactions

Maria Teresa Parreira, Micol Spitale, Maia Stiber, Shiye Cao, Amama Mahmood, Chien-Ming Huang, et al.

As robots become increasingly integrated into human environments, their ability to detect and respond to errors remains critical for maintaining user trust and interaction quality. While recent advances in machine learning have improved error detection capabilities, most approach…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.HC2026-07-13

Requirement-Driven Design of Whole-Body Social Tactile Sensing via Virtual Human-Robot Interaction

Dakarai Crowder, Ruohan Zhang, Alexis E. Block, Wenzhen Yuan

Tactile sensing for social-physical human-robot interaction (spHRI) is designed in a hardware-driven manner, where predefined sensor configurations constrain coverage, spatial resolution, and the range of recognizable gestures. We propose a requirement-driven framework that deriv…

View free PDFSource page