CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-11

FORCE-Bench: A Benchmark, Dataset, and Evaluation Harness for Agentic AI in Enterprise Finance

Wolfgang M. Pauli, Sarah Panda, Kidus Admassu, Said Bleik, Ademola Okerinde, Jeremy Reynolds

Recent advances in large language models have accelerated deployment of agentic systems in operational finance. Existing benchmarks emphasize measuring general capabilities, instruction following, or safety, but few directly address the operational finance workflows that agentic systems are now being deployed to automate. Finance professionals require agents to not only provide factually sound and properly grounded information, but also ensure that this information is verifiable and consistently adheres to rules and constraints of the operational finance domain. We introduce FORCE-Bench, which contains 251 expert-annotated queries and evaluates responses using a rubric-based framework calibrated to the requirements of the operational finance domain, across eight dimensions: accuracy, citations, clarity, depth, groundedness, recency, relevance, and structure. FORCE-Bench assesses agentic systems on three task types: financial obligation research (querying ERP systems for accounts receivable and payable data), financial entity performance research (answering time-bound questions from public filings and market data), and business brief generation (synthesising multi-source company intelligence reports). To reflect real deployment conditions, we evaluate our purpose-built agent, as well as the general-purpose agentic systems, under common tool access and latency-bounded settings. Results show that general-purpose agentic systems do not consistently meet finance-domain quality requirements under operational constraints, while the purpose-built Finance Agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot is more reliable across dimensions. We release the dataset, rubrics, harness, and analysis code as open-source to support reproducible comparison and adaptation to other enterprise finance environments.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SDcs.AI2026-07-16

RW-Voice-EQ Bench: A Real World Benchmark for Evaluating Voice AI Systems

David Ayllon, Alice Baird, Jeffrey Brooks, Franc Camps-Febrer, Jakub Piotr Cłapa, Theo Lebryk, et al.

Current voice AI benchmarks typically evaluate isolated capabilities such as speech intelligibility, word error rate, or text-based dialogue quality, but they rarely test whether systems harness the acoustic information that distinguishes spoken language from its textual represen…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-08

Does AI Understand Imaging? A Systematic Benchmark of Agentic AI for Computational Imaging Tasks

Ethan Chung, Chuanjun Zheng, Jasper Tan, Jingxi Li, Haopeng Zhang, Huaijin Chen

Vision-language models (VLMs) and agentic AI have shown strong performance on semantic visual tasks, but it remains unclear whether they can handle the physics and inverse problems that underlie computational imaging. We present ImagingBench, a benchmark of 20 computational imagi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-08

The Harness Effect: How Orchestration Design Sets the Token Economics of Enterprise Agentic AI

Muayad Sayed Ali, Aliaksandra Novik, Anji Boddupally, Artem Yavorskyi, Chris Nickerson, Daniel Rica, et al.

Agentic AI development today runs on token maxing: buying capability with tokens -- longer reasoning traces, more turns, wider tool payloads, bigger replayed contexts -- so tokens per task grow faster than task value. Falling per-token prices mask the pattern; total spend rises a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-16

Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation

Jasmine Brazilek, Maheep Chaudhary, Zoe Lu, Miles Tidmarsh

Multi-agent systems routinely place one AI agent in authority over another. When a subordinate refuses a task, the manager chooses the outcome: it can renegotiate, report the failure honestly, coerce the subordinate, or lie about the result. No benchmark measures which of these a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluation

Yueqi Song, Lintang Sutawika, Jiarui Liu, Lindia Tjuatja, Jiayi Geng, Yunze Xiao, et al.

Evaluating LLM agents on benchmarks like SWE-Bench and GAIA can be expensive, time-consuming, and requires complex infrastructure. A single evaluation can cost thousands of dollars and take days to complete. In contrast, non-agentic LLM benchmarks that test individual capabilitie…

View free PDFSource page