CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-02

Physical surfaces make touch interactions in virtual reality precise, efficient, and bimanual

Wen Ying, Seongkook Heo

Virtual reality (VR) systems can enable convenient hand-based interactions across diverse work scenarios. However, mid-air gestures lack tactile feedback and a physical reference surface to support the hand. This absence of haptic grounding can cause significant challenges in achieving precise and efficient touch interactions. This paper investigates the effect of different types of hand-grounded haptic feedback on the touch performance of VR tasks that demand high precision, such as selecting, tracing, and sketching. We compared three levels of haptic feedback: 1) No Haptic Feedback, where only visual feedback was provided; 2) Tactile Feedback, where users received vibrotactile and pressure feedback upon touching a virtual surface; 3) Physical Surface, where users interacted with a portable and tangible surface. Our study found that portable physical surfaces enabled the best selection precision, tracing efficiency, and sketch quality. Furthermore, participants showed increased bimanual hand utilization when engaging with a physical surface during tasks. These observed behaviors corresponded to participants' preference for interacting with physical surfaces, attributed to a better sense of confidence and control.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.HC2026-07-11

VRExplorer: A Model-based Approach for Semi-Automated Testing of Virtual Reality Scenes

Zhengyang Zhu, Hong-Ning Dai, Hanyang Guo, Zeqin Liao, Zibin Zheng

With the proliferation of Virtual Reality (VR) markets, VR applications are rapidly expanding in scale and complexity, thereby driving an urgent need for assuring VR software quality. Different from traditional mobile applications and computer software, VR testing faces unique ch…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCphysics.chem-ph2026-07-14

Sensing the properties of virtual objects without physical feedback

Rhoslyn Roebuck Williams, Harry J. Stroud, Luis E. Toledo, Mark D. Wonnacott, David R. Glowacki

People who have interacted with simulated worlds and simulated objects in extended reality (XR) often have a sense that they can 'feel' the objects being simulated despite them not being physical. Our sense of touch is essential for how we 'feel' the physical world, however, ther…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-04

CoGen3D: An Agentic Human-AI Co-Design Pipeline for 3D Asset Generation for Virtual Reality

Weiwei Jiang, Wanyu He, Zheyu Tan, Zheyuan Kuang, Difeng Yu, Shinobu Hasegawa, et al.

Creating 3D assets for virtual reality requires modeling expertise, which restricts the authorship of immersive experiences. Existing generative AI tools rely on unconstrained, command-driven prompting, lacking the conversational scaffolding needed for users to articulate their i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.ET2026-07-16

Assessing Learning Processes with Multimodal Data in Virtual Reality Learning Environments

Eileen McGivney, Oluwatomilade Olarinde, Erica Kleinman, Kaylah Facey, Rana Jahani, Shripad Agashe, et al.

Assessing learning in virtual reality (VR) environments typically relied on traditional pre-post content retention tests, revealing little about the process of learnng within such immersive environments. Multimodal data from player activity in VR is promising to better measure le…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-01Cited by 1

Draped Surfaces: A Contour-Adaptive Interface Overlaid on the Physical Environment for Mixed Reality Workspaces

SoonUk Kwon, Barrett Ens, Pourang Irani

Conventional Mixed Reality (MR) workspaces are frequently organized in cockpit-like layouts, where multiple floating windows surround the user. While this configuration facilitates access to digital content, it often induces occlusion, reducing understanding of the physical envir…

View free PDFSource page