CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-21Cited by 0

Building Trust in Autonomous Commerce: A Verifiable Global Event Timeline and AI-Ready Fraud Intelligence Layer

Rajat Srivastava

Agentic commerce protocols such as AP2 and ACP define mechanisms for secure agent-initiated transactions but do not provide interoperable, tamper-evident auditability or verifiable temporal ordering of events across heterogeneous domains. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a verifiable global event timeline for agentic commerce, constructed from four core components: canonical event schemas that enforce deterministic serialization, deterministic batch formation ensuring reproducible ordering without reliance on synchronized clocks, Merkle-based append-only commitments providing logarithmic-cost inclusion proofs, and blockchain anchoring establishing a tamper-evident temporal backbone. Building on this infrastructure, we introduce a cryptographically signed fraud marker that binds risk labels to anchored evidence through an unforgeable provenance chain, and a dataset lineage model enabling reproducible, tamper-evident AI training pipelines. Empirical results from a prototype implementation demonstrate: Merkle tree construction processes 50,000 events in 47 milliseconds; end-to-end verification completes in under 0.013 milliseconds regardless of batch size; inclusion proof sizes grow logarithmically from 320 bytes at 1,000 events to 512 bytes at 50,000 events; and Merkle-based verification outperforms linear scan by 14.4x at 50,000 events.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-23

Toward cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: A security hypothesis, preliminary formal model, and proof-of-concept implementation

M. Llambí-Morillas, D. Fernández-Fernández

Autonomous AI agents increasingly execute actions, invoke tools, and operate on protected resources with limited human oversight. Existing authentication and authorization mechanisms establish identity and delegate authority, but do not inherently provide cryptographic evidence t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.DL2026-07-12

Distributed Denial of Science: How Indirect Data Poisoning of AI Systems Can Industrialize Scientific Fraud

Bálint Gyevnár, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Nihar B. Shah

Scientific fraud is the instrument of doubt that malicious entities can use to establish controversy in science. Historically, it required the resources of a company: deep pockets, ghostwritten articles, and corrupt academics. Today, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CYcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-02

Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond

Javier Irigoyen, Roberto Daza, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Ruben Tolosana, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, et al.

The society and emerging risk-based regulatory frameworks for AI underscore the need for rigorous risk assessment to ensure safe and reliable AI systems. In response to this imperative, this paper presents an overview of AI risk assessment (identification and analysis) and manage…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.IRcs.SI2026-07-03

Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions

Eduardo Almeida Palmieri, Mohamed Chahine Ghanem, Dipo Dunsin, Zubair Baig, Ed de Quincey, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

The rapid growth of publicly available digital information has rendered manual open-source intelligence (OSINT) analysis insufficient for modern intelligence, cybersecurity, and cyber investigation. Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems, capable of tool use, multi-s…

View free PDFSource page