CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.IRcs.SI2026-07-03

Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions

Eduardo Almeida Palmieri, Mohamed Chahine Ghanem, Dipo Dunsin, Zubair Baig, Ed de Quincey, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

The rapid growth of publicly available digital information has rendered manual open-source intelligence (OSINT) analysis insufficient for modern intelligence, cybersecurity, and cyber investigation. Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems, capable of tool use, multi-step reasoning, and iterative intelligence generation, have emerged as promising solutions, yet evaluation frameworks have not kept pace with reported capabilities. This survey systematically reviews 74 studies and makes four contributions. First, it establishes agentic AI as a distinct analytical category rather than an extension of LLM prompting, organising the literature through an 11-category taxonomy covering LLM foundations, agentic architectures, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), knowledge graphs, prompt engineering, domain adaptation, evaluation benchmarks, and risk. Second, it identifies the hallucination-validation gap as a corpus-level finding: although hallucination is recognised as a major reliability concern in over twenty studies, end-to-end hallucination is empirically measured in only one OSINT-specific RAG-based system, non-reproducible conditions, while related reasoning and factual-correction studies evaluate general-domain question answering rather than OSINT. Third, it maps existing research to the OSINT lifecycle, showing strong support for collection and analysis but limited coverage of verification, reporting, dissemination, and decision support. Fourth, it derives a ten-point research agenda addressing evaluation, benchmarking, hallucination measurement, adversarial robustness, dark-web coverage, multimodal intelligence, and governance. It concludes that a human-AI co-pilot model, where LLMs assist collection and triage while analysts retain responsibility for verification and decision-making, represents the most defensible near-term deployment architecture.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.SI2026-07-11

Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability

Lingwei Wei, Dou Hu, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu, Philip S. Yu

Large language models (LLMs) have transformed misinformation from a primarily content-centric problem into a broader ecosystem-level security challenge. When misused, LLMs create risks beyond false content generation, enabling attacks on the social contexts, evidence sources, ret…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.IRcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-08

Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

Yufei Xia, Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang

Large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems enable complex problem solving through coordinated reasoning and action, but their distributed structure also introduces new challenges in diagnosing system-level failures. When an execution fails, identifying which agent is re…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CRcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-18

How Do You Choose Your AI Component? An Interview Study of Secure AI Integration in Practice

Mahzabin Tamanna, Elizabeth Lin, Sparsha Gowda, Laurie Williams, Dominik Wermke

The increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) as AI components in modern software systems introduces distinct security risks to the software supply chain. While many considerations and safety mechanisms are in place for components of the traditional software supply chai…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-09

Beware What You Autocomplete: Forensic Attribution of Backdoored Code Completions

Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang

Large language models have enabled powerful code completion systems that assist developers by predicting subsequent lines of code. However, these models remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where malicious fine-tuning data covertly implants unsafe behaviors. Despite advances in…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-07

Security and Privacy in Agentic AI: Grand Challenges and Future Directions

Adam Jenkins, Agnieszka Kitkowska, Caterina Maidhof, Diego Paracuellos, Francesco Sovrano, Gonzalo Gabriel Mendez, et al.

We present key challenges and future research directions in the security and privacy of agentic AI, based on a horizon-scanning exercise that brought together thirty leading international experts from academia, industry, and government to engage in focused discussions and collabo…

View free PDFSource page