CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-06-29

Benchmarking Geospatial Foundation Models for Agriculture Applications

Zhuocheng Shang, Sanmay Das, Ahmed Eldawy

Geospatial foundation models pretrained on satellite imagery promise broad generalization across remote sensing tasks and regions, but their geographic transferability has not been systematically tested, especially in agriculture applications. This paper presents a controlled benchmark that evaluates three models, Prithvi, SpectralGPT, and SatMAE, on multi-temporal crop segmentation and change detection across four U.S. states, Iowa, North Carolina, California, and Minnesota. By assigning each train, validation, and test split to a separate region, we measure how well each model transfers to land it has not seen. All three degrade sharply under regional distribution shift, predicting only the most common crops while missing rare ones. We further find that fitting these models to a shared input format affects each one differently, which complicates direct architectural comparison. These results expose key limitations of current geospatial foundation models for agriculture and point to region aware evaluation as a necessary standard.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-09

Predicting Viticulture Potential through an Ensemble of U-Net and a Geospatial Foundation Model

Jorge Ignacio Perez, Hwaai Kang Kee, Lucas Rassbach

Determining agricultural potential is fundamental to sustainable land management and agricultural planning. Remote sensing data is increasingly valuable as an avenue for agricultural potential due to the cost of traditional methods (surveys, in-situ measurements, soil testing, et…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-05

The Good, the Bad, and the Brittle: Benchmarking Robustness and Generalisation of Histopathology Foundation Models

Dhyey Yajnik, Amina Asif, Fayyaz Minhas

How robust and generalisable are pathology foundation models and have their scaling limites been reached? We benchmarked twelve pathology foundation models (PFMs) and ResNet baselines using our Robustness Evaluation and Enhancement Toolbox (REET) across eleven clinically realisti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-08

MedPMC: A Systematic Framework for Scaling High-Fidelity Medical Multimodal Data for Foundation Models

Hyunjae Kim, Dain Kim, Pan Xiao, Serina S. Applebaum, Younjoon Chung, Xuguang Ai, et al.

Medicine is inherently multimodal, requiring clinicians to synthesize information across diverse data streams. Yet the development of multimodal foundation models is constrained by limited access to large-scale, high-quality clinical data. Although PubMed Central (PMC) offers a c…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-01

Foundation Models vs. Radiomics for Lung Computed Tomography: A Benchmark of Feature Extractors, Classification Heads, and Segmentation Choices

Nils Neukirch, Martin Maurer, Nils Strodthoff

Radiomics is the established approach for CT-based lung cancer phenotyping, yet comparisons with foundation models rarely isolate contributions of feature extractor, classification head, and segmentation choice, or test cross-cohort robustness. We benchmark five feature extractor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivq-bio.QMcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-15

A vision foundation model for single-cell biology via spatial gene cartography

Ridvan Yesiloglu, Sakib Mostafa, James Zou, Ash Alizadeh, Jiajun Wu, Lei Xing, et al.

Most single-cell foundation models are adapted from language models, representing each cell as a sequence of gene tokens. This discards the relationships among genes and often the magnitude of their expression. We present scVision, a vision foundation model that instead renders e…

View free PDFSource page