CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-20

Integrating High-Level Requirements to Low-Level Tests with Machine-Readable V&V Specifications

Mansur Arief, Nur Ahmad Khatim, Ali Akarma, Ahmad Alfan Alfian Irfan

Modern software teams have mature tools for low-level testing, such as pytest, JUnit, and Jest, which make it inexpensive to write unit tests and run them on every commit. Systems engineering, in parallel, has developed rigorous principles for design verification and validation (V&V), which has worked very well across engineering discipline to align user expecations and requirements with developers' deliverables. In practice, however, the two rarely connect, and the link between users' high-level requirements and the low-level tests that machines actually run is maintained by hand, if at all. This gap is increasingly costly for AI-enabled and cyber-physical systems, for which regulators now ask for traceable evidence that high-level requirements are met, while raw test results provide little of the structure such evidence requires. We introduce VNVSpec, an open-source framework that makes V&V specifications machine-readable and executable. With this framework, users state high-level requirements directly or import them from catalogs derived from published standards. Then, the framework checks requirement quality, supports decomposition into module-level requirements with explicit metrics and acceptance criteria, links these requirements to test results through a traceability graph, and compiles the collected evidence into verdicts and audit-ready reports. We evaluate the framework by self-application, in which it is continuously assessed in CI against its own specification of 36 requirements verified by 449 tests, completed within limited time which scales linearly and thus can handle up to 10,000 requirements. We also discuss how the framework extends to testing black-box AI models and AI coding agents. The framework, its full test suite, the catalogs, and the benchmark scripts are available at https://github.com/ai-vnv/vnvspec.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-15

NexForge: Scaling Agent Capabilities through Requirement-Driven Task Synthesis for LLMs

Jiarong Zhao, Zhikai Lei, Zhiheng Xi, Rui Zheng, Hang Yan, Jie Zhou, et al.

Scaling executable agent training data for LLM post-training is bottlenecked by substrate-bound methods that tie task generation to predefined tools, repositories, or skill graphs: expanding coverage requires manual substrate engineering, each new domain demands a bespoke pipelin…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-19

A Large-Scale Measurement of AI Bill of Materials Completeness in Hugging Face Models

Md Erfan, Ahmed Ryan, Md Rayhanur Rahman

Pretrained machine learning (ML) models help developers build ML-intensive software systems without training models from scratch. However, model repositories often provide incomplete machine-readable documentation about model provenance, licenses, datasets, limitations, and exter…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DCcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-17

JoyNexus: Service-Oriented Multi-Tenant Post-Training for VLA Models

Haoran Sun, Wentao Zhang, Junyang Hua, Hedan Yang, Yongjian Guo, Yifei Zhang, et al.

The post-training of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models is essential due to the diversity of simulators, robot embodiments, and task objectives. Existing compute services, whether offered as direct accelerator rental or batch-workload submission, typically allocate an exclusive…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-03

Which Algorithm Specification Formats Help Language Models Implement Machine Learning Algorithms?

Masahiro Kato, Taka Kato

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to implement algorithms from research manuscripts, but papers often leave implementation choices implicit. This study examines how the written format of an algorithm specification affects first-pass LLM implementation accuracy. W…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-13

Self-Improving AI Coding Agents Through Accumulated Behavioral Rules: A Closed-Loop Framework

Aditya Aggarwal, Nahid Farhady Ghalaty

LLM-based coding agents repeat the same classes of mistakes across sessions because they lack a mechanism to retain corrections from human review feedback. We present a closed-loop framework in which every accepted review comment is codified as a persistent behavioral rule, progr…

View free PDFSource page