CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-06

aiAuthZ: Off-Host, Identity-Bound Authorization for AI Agents

Sai Varun Kodathala

AI agents issue tool calls on the basis of text they cannot verify, so any party who controls part of the context can forge the appearance of authority. I evaluate 15 contemporary language models against eight attack scenarios derived from a published corpus of real agent incidents and find that refusal varies from 100% down to 38% across fully evaluated models; the most expensive model refused only half of the attacks despite a twentyfold price spread. I present aiAuthZ, an authorization gateway that moves the safety decision off the agent's host. Before a tool call executes, the gateway verifies caller identity with a per-message HMAC-SHA256 signature bound to a single-use nonce and a timestamp window, and it evaluates a role-based and argument-level policy that the agent can neither read nor modify. Every decision joins a SHA-256 hash-chained audit log, and each accepted message yields an HMAC-authenticated QR receipt that achieves 94% mean verification across eight transmission channels, with zero forgeries accepted in 25 wrong-key trials. With the gateway in place, residual attack success falls to 0% for all 15 models at no more than 0.03 ms of added decision latency. On the AgentDojo banking suite, aiAuthZ blocks all seven attacker-directed tool calls the evaluated agents emit, at the cost of one legitimate first-time payment, while a spotlighting baseline allows two injections to succeed. Across nine in-scope case studies from the same incident corpus, aiAuthZ blocks nine of nine, against four of nine for a policy baseline without identity binding. The gateway does not prevent a model from being deceived; it prevents a deceived model from acting beyond the verified user's authority on every call routed through it. The implementation and all experiments are released at https://github.com/Sports-Vision-Inc/aiAuthZ.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-20

Self-State Attacks on Self-Hosted AI Agents: How Far Can OS Defenses Go?

Yimeng Chen, Nathanaël Denis, Roberto Di Pietro, Jürgen Schmidhuber

Self-hosted AI agents read and write their own memory and configuration files to function. An agent may get compromised via corruption of its own state -- a compromise realized via legitimate OS system call invocation. We refer to this class of threats as self-state attacks. In t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-23

Toward cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: A security hypothesis, preliminary formal model, and proof-of-concept implementation

M. Llambí-Morillas, D. Fernández-Fernández

Autonomous AI agents increasingly execute actions, invoke tools, and operate on protected resources with limited human oversight. Existing authentication and authorization mechanisms establish identity and delegate authority, but do not inherently provide cryptographic evidence t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-06

Agent Data Injection Attacks are Realistic Threats to AI Agents

Woohyuk Choi, Juhee Kim, Taehyun Kang, Jihyeon Jeong, Luyi Xing, Byoungyoung Lee

AI agents act on behalf of user prompts, consuming external data and taking actions based on the agent context. Prior research on AI agent security has primarily focused on indirect prompt injection (IPI). Its most well-studied category is instruction injection, where attacker-co…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-15

How Agents Ask for Permission: User Permissions for AI Agents, from Interfaces to Enforcement

Alexandra E. Michael, Franziska Roesner

As AI agents gain prevalence, users are increasingly exposed to the risks such systems entail. Prompt injection attacks, as well as hallucination, can cause agents to leak private information to third parties. As autonomous systems, agents also present the more active danger of p…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-16

Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation

Jasmine Brazilek, Maheep Chaudhary, Zoe Lu, Miles Tidmarsh

Multi-agent systems routinely place one AI agent in authority over another. When a subordinate refuses a task, the manager chooses the outcome: it can renegotiate, report the failure honestly, coerce the subordinate, or lie about the result. No benchmark measures which of these a…

View free PDFSource page