CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-20

Federated Lightweight Fine-Tuning

Radhakrishna Achanta, Will Reed

Federated fine-tuning is bottlenecked by communication: FedAvg and pseudo-gradient schemes transmit a payload that scales with the model, and gradient compression shrinks it by only a constant factor. We take a different lever. Mapping networks generate a network's weights from a small trainable latent through a frozen affine projection; because the map is shared and affine, averaging latents is exactly averaging the generated weights. We turn this into a practical low-bandwidth federated channel with two changes: a low-rank, seed-regenerable factorisation of the projection (cutting generator memory from ~80 GB to ~10 MB), and a delta formulation $θ= θ^{\mathrm{pre}} + U V^{\top} z$ that learns an additive correction around a shared centrally-pretrained base -- federated fine-tuning, which is what makes the method work at scale. A frozen orthogonal classifier head further removes the head from the payload while improving accuracy. On CIFAR-100 with ResNet-18+GroupNorm, our method (FLITE, Federated Low-rank Iterative Training Engine) communicates 1,280 floats (~5 KB) per client per round -- an 8718x reduction -- and reaches 74.67%, within ~0.5 pp of full-weight FedAvg. The averaging identity holds to floating-point precision ($6 \times 10^{-8}$); the method sits one to two orders of magnitude below PowerSGD and top-k on the bandwidth-accuracy Pareto; it matches or exceeds full-weight FedAvg under strong non-IID skew. int4 latents reach 648 bytes per round at unchanged accuracy, whereas int4 full-weight FedAvg collapses to chance.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-30

Mixture-of-Control: State-Aware Fine-Tuning for Transformer-based Models

Duc Anh Nguyen, Tien Ngoc Luu, Tung Pham, Toan Tran

State-based fine-tuning has emerged as a compelling alternative to weight-based adaptation for transformers, updating lightweight controls into states rather than model weights, offering substantial memory savings while retaining parameter efficiency. However, most existing state…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-06

Pretraining Curricula Enable Selective Fine-tuning

Sebastian A. Bruijns, Jirko Rubruck, Mia H. Whitefield, Kai J. Sandbrink, Fazl Barez, Christopher Summerfield

Transformers follow implicit curricula whereby some tasks are learned before others. However, how explicit pretraining curricula influence learning, generalization, and the selectivity of fine-tuning is unclear. This is important for AI safety, where fine-tuning is used to select…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CVcs.DC2026-07-13

Continual Learning with Elastic Regularization and Synthetic Replay for Federated MLLM Fine-Tuning

Jing Liu, Chenxuanyin Zou, Jiayang Ren, Gaoyun Fang, Chengfang Li, Yan Wang, et al.

Federated fine-tuning of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across distributed networks enables privacy-sensitive adaptation to evolving data streams, yet a fundamental obstacle prevents robust deployment in dynamic environments: catastrophic forgetting, wherein sequential…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LGecon.GN2026-06-29

Field Order Should Not Matter: Permutation-Invariant Embedding Model Fine-Tuning for Structured Metadata Retrieval

Aivin V. Solatorio, Olivier Dupriez, Rafael Macalaba

We study retrieval over catalogs of structured metadata, where each record is a small schema whose fields answer different kinds of query. Embedding a record with a text encoder first serializes its fields into a string, which forces a choice of field order. We show this choice,…

View free PDFSource page