CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-06-29

Concept Catalyst: Exploring Scrutable Interfaces to Structure K-12 Teacher Interactions with Generative AI

Gennie Mansi, Sunni Newton, Roxanne Moore, Meltem Alemdar, Mark Riedl

Purpose: This paper explores how to align AI-based tools with teachers' classroom needs by using scrutable interfaces -- interfaces that link an easily manipulable knowledge representation to an underlying AI model, so users can change the system's outputs without understanding its details. It provides an in-depth discussion and example of a scrutable interface that structures teachers' interactions with generative AI. This study aims to expand how and where scrutable interfaces are used in AI-based tools to support teachers, who have not been historically targeted in the design of scrutable systems. Design/Methodology/Approach: This paper presents the design and evaluation of Concept Catalyst, an AI-based tool with a scrutable interface, created to support teachers' reflection while using generative AI for curriculum development. It presents the findings from an exploratory study using Wizard-of-Oz testing with middle and high school engineering teachers, resulting in 10 depth interviews lasting 55 minutes on average. Screen/audio recordings and the classroom content teachers produced during the session were also collected. Findings: The paper provides empirical insights about how scrutable interfaces can positively structure teachers' interactions with generative AI models when creating classroom content. Findings suggest that scrutable interfaces can help teachers reflect on their teaching practices while improving efficacy, efficiency, and motivation when using AI. What is original/value of the paper: This paper explores an identified need to support teachers' classroom practices and needs when using generative AI. It extends the consideration of scrutable interfaces in two ways: to support teachers as users (not just students) and to structure interactions with generative AI models.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HC2026-06-30

Evaluating Interactivity: Toward Automated Assessment of AI-Generated Explorable Explanations

Xiaozao Wang, Zhewei Wang, Hongyi Wen

While large language models now enable rapid generation of interactive learning materials, evaluating the interaction quality of these explorable explanations remains an open challenge. Existing benchmarks largely focus on code executability or visual fidelity, providing limited…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-08

Creativity from Friction: Human-AI Interaction for Exploratory Structural Design

Ricardo Maia Avelino, Rita Sevastjanova, Tom Van Mele, Philippe Block, Mennatallah El-Assady

AI agents that generate final answers based on user input often do not meet the needs of creative fields. Fields such as structural design and architecture need interactive systems that help users externalise and develop ideas, explore alternatives, and refine partial solutions.…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-01

Mind the Trust Gap: Identifying (Mis)alignments in Teacher-Student Views Toward Control and Agency in K-12 Classroom AI

Tomohiro Nagashima, Lisa Siegrist, Niklas Scholz, Shintaro Sato, Martina Vincoli, Man Su

As Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technologies have been integrated into school classrooms where multiple stakeholders (with different roles) interact with each other, it is critical to deeply understand stakeholder views in the classroom. In particular, prior work has not fu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CY2026-06-26

Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images

Negar Kamali, Candice Rockell Gerstner, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh

Across social and online platforms, people are increasingly exposed to AI-generated images. As a consequence, the task of distinguishing AI-generated from authentic images is becoming a central challenge for information ecosystems. While humans perform better than chance, accurac…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-07

Exploring the Interaction of Explanation Styles, Context, and Trust of AI Privacy Redaction in AI-mediated Interactions

Roshni Kaushik, Maarten Sap, Koichi Onoue

AI-mediated communication is increasingly being utilized to help facilitate interactions; however, in privacy sensitive domains, an AI mediator has the additional challenge of considering how to preserve privacy. In these contexts, a mediator may redact or withhold information, r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-15

Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)

Shahin Hossain, Tukhbita Afroz Nawmi

As generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in undergraduate academic writing, how students rely on these tools, rather than simply whether they use them, has become a central question for learning, academic integrity, and educational equity. Existing measures of relia…

View free PDFSource page