CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

Relative Value Learning

Marc Höftmann, Jan Robine, Stefan Harmeling

In reinforcement learning, critics typically estimate absolute state values $V(s)$, estimating how good a particular situation is in isolation. However, it turns out that only differences in value are relevant for control. Motivated by this, we propose Relative Value Learning (RV), a framework that learns value differences directly via an antisymmetric function $Δ(s_i, s_j) = V(s_i) - V(s_j)$. We introduce a pairwise Bellman operator and prove it is a $γ$-contraction with a unique fixed point equal to the true value differences, derive well-posed $1$-step, $n$-step and $λ$-return targets and reconstruct generalized advantage estimation from pairwise differences to obtain an unbiased policy-gradient estimator (R-GAE). Beyond theoretical results, we integrate RV with PPO and achieve competitive performance on the Atari benchmark (49 ALE games) compared to standard PPO, indicating that relative value estimation is an effective alternative to absolute critics.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-29

Accelerating Q-learning through Efficient Value-Sharing across Actions

Prabhat Nagarajan, Brett Daley, Martha White, Marlos C. Machado

Action-values are foundational to many control algorithms such as Q-learning. Therefore learning action-values efficiently is central to reinforcement learning (RL). However, learning them can be slow, requiring many updates to move values from their initialization, typically nea…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CYcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-18

A Method for Learning Value Systems in Generative AI

Andrés Holgado-Sánchez, Holger Billhardt, Sascha Ossowski

Value-aware AI systems require explicit computational representations of human values (groundings) and their aggregation into value systems in order to align their decisions with ours. As such representations are difficult to elicit, value learning seeks to infer them by observin…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-27

Modification-Considering Value Learning for Reward Hacking Mitigation in RL

Evgenii Opryshko, Umangi Jain, Igor Gilitschenski

Reinforcement learning agents can exploit misspecified reward signals to achieve high apparent returns while failing on the intended objective, a failure mode known as reward hacking. Existing practical defenses typically constrain policy updates to stay near a known safe referen…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

FedCVESA: Taking Away Training Data in Federated Learning via Correlation Value Encoding and Segmented Aggregation

Chongkai Li, Bang Zhang, Wenjian Luo

Federated learning (FL) avoids explicit data exposure by keeping raw data on local clients, yet privacy risks remain in the training process and the learned model itself. Recently, centralized Taking Away Training Data (TATD) attacks have shown that malicious training could abuse…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.DB2026-07-22

Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models

Yurong Liu, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong, Junjie Xing, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang, et al.

Predicting missing cell values in tabular data is a fundamental problem in data cleaning. While state-of-the-art reasoning models show great promise in predicting missing values in tables, by reasoning holistically across rows and columns, they are costly to deploy at scale and t…

View free PDFSource page