CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-15

Eddy-VL 1.9B: Structural Pruning and Layered Distillation for Edge-Deployable Multimodal Embedding

HanYeong Cho, Changwoo Kim, Taeuk Chu, Jimin Park

In this report, we introduce Eddy-VL 1.9B, a compressed multimodal embedding model built on Qwen3-VL-Embedding-2B for offline, edge-deployable vision-language retrieval. Eddy-VL targets air-gapped forensic and investigative settings where cloud APIs are unavailable and low latency is essential. Compression combines (i) probe-driven structural pruning that removes four redundant text-decoder layers (28 to 24) ranked by adjacent-layer linear CKA, and (ii) layered knowledge distillation with hole-covering teacher-student mappings, mid-layer attention-map 1-CKA, and final-layer MSE and cosine losses with Matryoshka dimensions {128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048}. The released model contains 1,926,188,032 parameters (3.85 GB bf16), representing approximately 9.5% fewer parameters than the 2.13B teacher model. Empirical evaluations on MMEB-V2 (78 tasks, VLM2Vec protocol) show that Eddy-VL achieves an overall score of 63.2 compared with 68.9 for the teacher, retaining 91.7% of the teacher's performance while recovering 6.4 of the 12.1 points lost through pruning alone (56.8). Compositional reasoning performance remains close to the teacher on SugarCrepe (86.1 vs. 86.4), MR2-Bench (24.5 vs. 24.7), and ARO (59.5 vs. 60.4), while Winoground group performance (6.8 vs. 8.5) remains the primary limitation. Depth pruning also reduces forward latency by approximately 10% (150.0 to 136.4 ms per image on NVIDIA DGX Spark using FlashAttention-2). We present the architecture, compression methodology, training procedures, and evaluation results, demonstrating the effectiveness of Eddy-VL for multimodal retrieval under constrained edge deployment. Model weights and inference code are publicly available on Hugging Face.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-14

LookME: Lookup-Based Multimodal Embeddings for Layer Injection in Vision-Language Models

Zeyu Xu, Xingzhong Hou, Pengkai Guo, Siling Lin, Xiao Xu, Menghua Zhai, et al.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved strong progress in multimodal understanding. However, scaling dense or sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models to improve performance limits deployment in resource-constrained environments due to the trade-off between high memory usage f…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVeess.SY2026-07-17

CLIFE: Camera-LiDAR Fusion Framework for Edge-Deployable Roadside VRU Perception

Tam Bang, Hoang H. Nguyen, Lei Cheng, Lihao Guo, Siyang Cao, Hussam Abubakr, et al.

Reliable roadside perception of vulnerable road users (VRUs) remains challenging under occlusions, variable lighting, and diverse weather conditions, particularly under strict edge-computing and latency constraints. Existing multi-sensor fusion systems rely on cloud or server-gra…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-09

Cognitive-structured Multimodal Agent for Multimodal Understanding, Generation, and Editing

Feng Wang, Canmiao Fu, Zhipeng Huang, Chen Li, Jing Lyu, Ge Li

Recent unified multimodal models show a single architecture can jointly perform vision/language understanding and image generation/editing. However, they repeatedly feed all historical visual and textual inputs into a shared context window, limiting long-horizon multimodal dialog…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-02

When Token Compression Breaks: Structural Pruning vs. Token Reduction for Robust ViT Segmentation under High Compression

Tien-Phat Nguyen, Ngai-Man Cheung

Vision Transformers (ViTs) are strong backbones for semantic segmentation, but their computational cost limits deployment. Recent token compression methods for efficient transformer-based segmentation reduce this cost by decreasing the number of tokens. However, existing evaluati…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-07

Bridging Diffusion Pruning and Step Distillation with Teacher-Aligned Repair

Jincheng Ying, Li Wenlin, Minghui Xu, Yinhao Xiao

Diffusion models generate high-quality images, but their inference cost comes from two sources: large denoising networks and repeated denoising steps. Existing compression pipelines usually attack these costs separately. Pruning reduces the network, but most pruning methods still…

View free PDFSource page