CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-01

IsoSci: A Benchmark of Isomorphic Cross-Domain Science Problems for Evaluating Reasoning versus Knowledge Retrieval in LLMs

Samir Abdaljalil, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban

We introduce ISOSCI, a benchmark of isomorphic cross-domain science problem pairs that separates reasoning ability from domain knowledge retrieval in LLM evaluation. Each pair shares identical logical structure but requires different domain-specific knowledge, enabling controlled attribution of reasoning-mode gains. Across five model pairs spanning four model families, we find that 91.3% of reasoning-mode gains are knowledge-dependent rather than structure-invariant (63/69 gains; Wilson 95% CI [82.3%, 96.0%]), directly challenging the assumption that chain-of-thought reasoning improves short-horizon procedural scientific problem-solving. Reasoning toggles on highly capable models provide less than 5 percentage points accuracy gain across all domains, and a reasoning-specialized model (o3-mini) that outperforms its standard counterpart on GPQA Diamond (+19.2 percentage points) underperforms on ISOSCI (-24.7 percentage points), showing that benchmark choice determines conclusions about reasoning utility. We release ISOSCI at https://huggingface.co/datasets/isosci/isosci

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-25

NuclearQAv2: A Structured Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-Science Competence in Large Language Models

Henry Shaowu Yuchi, Michal Kucer, Benjamin H. Sims, Selma Peterson, Emily Taylor

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of tasks, but ensuring their reliability in highly technical domains remains a significant challenge. In nuclear engineering, problem solving often requires not only factual knowledge but also q…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-06-28

The Complexity Ceiling Benchmark: A Multi-Domain Evaluation of Sequential Reasoning Under Depth Scaling

Shubh Chapra, Dhruv Kumar, Murari Mandal, Yash Sinha

We introduce the Complexity Ceiling Benchmark (CCB), a controlled evaluation of how language-model reasoning decays as the number of required sequential steps grows. CCB fixes the semantic content of a task and varies only its depth N in {5,...,50} across three structurally disti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-06-29

SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

Nikolay Georgiev, Maria Drencheva, Kseniia Ibragimova, Ivo Petrov, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin Vechev

As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-29

Indi-RomCoM: Code-Mixed Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Romanized Indic-English Instructions

Avisha Das, Mihir Parmar, Mohana Ramnath, Pulkit Verma

Romanized Code Mixing (RCM), where bilingual speakers fluidly blend local languages with English in Roman script, has emerged as the dominant form of communication across multilingual communities. While Large Language Models (LLMs) perform strongly on monolingual and native-scrip…

View free PDFSource page