CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-04

TESSERA v2: Scaling Pixel-wise Earth Foundation Models

Zhengpeng Feng, Sadiq Jaffer, Ira Shokar, Jovana Knezevic, Mark Elvers, Clement Atzberger, Robin Young, Aneesh Naik, Niall Robinson, Andrew Blake, David Coomes, Anil Madhavapeddy, Srinivasan Keshav

Pixel-wise Earth-observation (EO) foundation models are now achieving state-of-the-art performance via generated spatial embeddings. However, how these models scale and how best to spend a pretraining budget remain poorly understood. We present the largest controlled scaling study for EO to date: 395 training runs on 1,024 GH200 superchips within a fixed pixel-wise Barlow Twins family, each evaluated on 15 downstream tasks. We find that pretraining loss barely predicts downstream performance (|Pearson r| < 0.2), so selecting models by loss wastes a large share of the compute. We also find that, as the training budget grows, the encoder and the data should grow together while the projector stays fixed, which gives a simple rule for allocating compute. Using this rule, we train a family of pixel-wise models (0.5B and 1B, with a 2B model in training) and distill them into compact students for embeddings-as-data deployment. The 21-million-parameter distilled TESSERA v2-1B-M in aggregate outperforms all open and proprietary models tested, some of which are orders of magnitude larger. These students produce Matryoshka representations that are inexpensive to serve: a 16-dimensional prefix keeps 92% of the full 128-dimensional performance at 1/8 of the storage. Upon completion of training we plan to release v2 global embeddings covering 2017-2025. Together, these results give a concrete, empirically grounded recipe for scaling pixel-wise EO foundation models: train large encoders, select by downstream performance, and distil into flexible student models. All code will be released at https://github.com/ucam-eo/tessera.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-05

The Good, the Bad, and the Brittle: Benchmarking Robustness and Generalisation of Histopathology Foundation Models

Dhyey Yajnik, Amina Asif, Fayyaz Minhas

How robust and generalisable are pathology foundation models and have their scaling limites been reached? We benchmarked twelve pathology foundation models (PFMs) and ResNet baselines using our Robustness Evaluation and Enhancement Toolbox (REET) across eleven clinically realisti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-08

MedPMC: A Systematic Framework for Scaling High-Fidelity Medical Multimodal Data for Foundation Models

Hyunjae Kim, Dain Kim, Pan Xiao, Serina S. Applebaum, Younjoon Chung, Xuguang Ai, et al.

Medicine is inherently multimodal, requiring clinicians to synthesize information across diverse data streams. Yet the development of multimodal foundation models is constrained by limited access to large-scale, high-quality clinical data. Although PubMed Central (PMC) offers a c…

View free PDFSource page
arxivq-bio.QMcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-15

A vision foundation model for single-cell biology via spatial gene cartography

Ridvan Yesiloglu, Sakib Mostafa, James Zou, Ash Alizadeh, Jiajun Wu, Lei Xing, et al.

Most single-cell foundation models are adapted from language models, representing each cell as a sequence of gene tokens. This discards the relationships among genes and often the magnitude of their expression. We present scVision, a vision foundation model that instead renders e…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-08

LoCA: Spatially-Aware Low-Rank Convolutional Adaptation of Vision Foundation Models

Sojung An, Junha Lee, Sujeong You, Nam Ik Cho, Donghyun Kim

Pre-trained Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) provide strong visual representations for diverse downstream tasks. The key challenge of VFM adaptation stems from the prohibitive costs of full fine-tuning and catastrophic forgetting. To address this, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has em…

View free PDFSource page