CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-24

J-CoT: Chain-of-Thought in J-Space

Junde Wu, Jiayuan Zhu, Fengling Liu, Minhao Hu, Jiazhen Pan

Chain-of-thought prompting improves language-model reasoning by carrying intermediate states across successive computation steps. However, relying on natural language as the only recurrent interface is overly restrictive, since many transient computations do not need to be fully verbalized. Existing latent-reasoning methods remove this constraint by recurrently propagating continuous hidden states. However, these methods pass a dense hidden vector as a whole, without an explicit mechanism for selecting and organizing the information needed by the next reasoning step. This motivates an intermediate interface that remains linguistically grounded without requiring a decoded sentence. We introduce \textbf{J-CoT}, a recurrent reasoning framework built on \emph{J-space}, a vocabulary-indexed coordinate system within the model's hidden representations. Within each cycle, the model computes in its full hidden space. At the cycle boundary, J-CoT expresses the intermediate state as vocabulary-indexed coefficients, carries these coefficients forward as a \emph{J-thought}, and maps them back into the model's hidden representation for the next cycle. J-CoT therefore requires neither a fluent intermediate rationale nor recurrence over the complete hidden state. Under matched backbone and inference settings, J-CoT-Zero matches or exceeds the strongest evaluated latent-reasoning baseline on every benchmark, while J-CoT-Train obtains the highest score across the evaluated mathematical, scientific, coding, and structured path-reasoning tasks.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-23

Token Budget Saturation and Mechanistic Early Detection of Reasoning Non-Convergence in Chain-of-Thought Models

Renuka Oladri, Niveda Jawahar, Abdirisak Mohamed

Chain-of-thought reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B exhibit a bimodal convergence pattern: generations either terminate within a token budget (converged) or exhaust it without reaching a conclusion (non-converged). We characterize this phenomenon empirically, sh…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LO2026-07-11

Interventional Grounding Audits: Black-Box Premise-Dependency Tests for LLM Chain-of-Thought via Predicate Substitution

Hironao Nakamura

Large language models produce chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning that appears logically sound yet may not genuinely depend on its stated premises. We introduce interventional grounding audits, a black-box, step-level test of premise dependency: we intervene on a single premise by s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-06-29

Does Verbose Chain-of-Thought Really Help? In-Distribution Evidence that Content, Not Length, Matters

Wenlong Wang, Fergal Reid

Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting improves LLM reasoning, but the source is contested: do the intermediate steps help because they carry useful semantic content, or because conditioning on more tokens buys extra computation before the model commits to an answer? We bring two lines…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-08

Length Penalties Make Chain-of-Thought Less Monitorable

Bryce Little

Length-penalized reinforcement learning can shorten chain-of-thought reasoning while hiding an influence that drives the model's answer. In our experiments, training with length penalties does not stop misleading hints from steering models, even though the models' chains of thoug…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-06

Retroactive Chain-of-Thought (RetroCoT): Forensic Reconstruction Prompts as a Safety Diagnostic Across Model Generations

Samira Hajizadeh

Safety alignment in large language models is typically evaluated against direct, imperative harmful requests. We show that this alignment is highly conditioned on pragmatic register: models that refuse a direct request frequently comply when the same underlying objective is expre…

View free PDFSource page